JAMES NII ADDY v. WILLIAM SARFO AND GEORGE BERKO
April 12, 2023
HIGH COURT
GHANA
CORAM
- HIS LORDSHIP JUSTICE WILLIAM BOAMPONG ESQ
Areas of Law
- Contract Law
- Civil Procedure
April 12, 2023
HIGH COURT
GHANA
CORAM
Try asking the following...
The Plaintiff herein issued out his Writ of Summons jointly and severally
against the Defendants claiming as follows:
a) Cash the sum of One Hundred Thousand Ghana Cedis
(GH¢100,000.00) consisting of the principal sum of Fifty Thousand
Ghana Cedis (GH¢50,000.00) Defendants borrowed from the Plaintiff
on 12th November 2017 for four (4) months and interest of Fifty
Thousand Ghana Cedis (GH¢50,000.00) for four (4) months which
principal sum with interest of One Hundred Thousand Ghana Cedis
(GH¢100,000.00) became due and payable from 24th March 2018 but
which Defendants have failed to pay.
b) Interest on the sum of GH¢100,000.00 at the Commercial Bank Rate
from 24th March 2018 till final payment.
c) Damages for breach of contract.
d) Cost.
On the 18th October, 2018 this Court differently constituted entered final
judgment against the 1st Defendant on Plaintiffs reliefs (a) and (b). The
Court then constituted entered Interlocutory Judgment against the 1st
Defendant on Plaintiff’s Relief (c). No cost was also awarded against the 1st
Defendant in respect of his Relief (c) which prayed for costs as well as
Reliefs (a) and (b).
Plaintiff’s Case:
On the 12th November 2017, the Defendants approached the Plaintiff for a
loan of GH¢50,000.00. The Defendants promised the Plaintiff to pay the
loan of GH¢50,000.00 after four (4) months and further pay an interest of
GH¢50,000.00 to the principal sum. The Plaintiff gave the said loan to the
Defendants.
The 2nd Defendant then relinquished his land document and building plan
to the Plaintiff as collateral security for the loan. The Defendants further
executed a document evidencing the contract.
According to the Plaintiff the repayment date of 24th March 2018 has elapsed
but the Defendants have refused or neglected to repay the GH¢50,000.00
with the agreed interest of GH¢50,000.00 despite repeated demands by the
Plaintiff.
2nd Defendant’s case:
2nd Defendant admits that both Defendants took a loan of GH¢50,000.00 at
an interest of GH¢50,000.00 to be paid within four (4) months from the
Plaintiff’s wife.
2nd Defendant adds that after some negotiations between him and the 1st
Defendant, the 1st Defendant absorbed the loan. This had been captured in
the Memorandum of Understanding they entered into. In effect the 1st
Defendant had taken upon himself to be responsible for the loan the
Defendants contracted from the Plaintiff.
According to the 2nd Defendant when the 1st Defendant was delay
AI Generated Summary
Justice William Boampong of the High Court adjudicated a loan dispute involving William Sarfo and George Kwaku Berko, who secured GH50,000 from the Plaintiff on 12 November 2017 with an agreed GH50,000 interest due after four months, totaling GH100,000 by 24 March 2018. The transaction was evidenced by Exhibit A and corroborated by Eric Lamptey (PW1). Berko provided land and building documents as collateral. The Defendants repaid only GH5,000, leaving GH45,000 outstanding. A Memorandum of Understanding among Sarfo, Berko, and Kwabena Boateng/Vincent Sam did not bind the Plaintiff, so Berko remained liable under Exhibit A. Finding the agreed interest unconscionable, the court reopened the contract and applied the current bank rate to interest calculations. It awarded general damages of GH10,000 and costs of GH25,000 against both defendants, and entered judgment jointly and severally, with instructions to respect different sums awarded against each defendant.