ISAAC KWARTENG v. HARUNA FEISEL IDDRIS, GEORGE ADDAI BOATENG AND BERNARD DAMOAH
June 26, 2023
CIRCUIT COURT
GHANA
CORAM
- HER HONOUR ENID MARFUL-SAU
Areas of Law
- Civil Procedure
- Contract Law
June 26, 2023
CIRCUIT COURT
GHANA
CORAM
Try asking the following...
RULING
By a Writ of Summons and Statement of Claim filed on 9th December, 2022,
Plaintiff claims against Defendants jointly and severally the following reliefs:
a. ‚An order of the court directed at the defendant to release the car
documents which they sold to plaintiff somewhere in June, 2021.
b. A further order of the court to retrain [sic] the defendants from
harassing and threatening his life.
c. General damages for breach of contract.
d. Substantial cost.‛
It is the case of Plaintiff that he entered into an agreement with the 1st
Defendant for the purchase of three shops at the cost of One Hundred and
Fifty Thousand Ghana Cedis (GHȼ150,000.00) and made part payment of
Ninety Thousand Ghana Cedis (GHȼ90,000.00). According to him, he
demanded for the documents of the shop and requested to meet the shop
owner before he paid the balance due, but 1st Defendant refused to do so and
he found out that 1st Defendant had defrauded him. Plaintiff says that he
made a report at the Kotoku Police Station where the matter was referred to
the Police Headquarters. According to Plaintiff, at the Police Headquarters, 1st
Defendant admitted selling the said shops to Plaintiff and pleaded to
exchange his car for the said shops, so he sent the 2nd Defendant to bring his
car. Plaintiff says that the car was brought, and 1st Defendant promised to
provide the documents of the car within a week, but he failed to do so. He
says that he made an additional payment of Eighty-five Thousand Ghana
Cedis (GHȼ85,000.00) as the total cost of the car. Plaintiff says that 1st and 2nd
Defendants later brought the 3rd Defendant and introduced him as the owner
of the car with the 3rd Defendant lodging a complaint at the police station that
Plaintiff had stolen his vehicle.
1st and 2nd Defendants entered appearance through counsel on 7th February,
3rd Defendant entered appearance on 21st December, 2022 and filed a
Statement of Defence and Counterclaim on 11th January, 2023. On the same
date, 3rd Defendant filed an application for preservation of Honda CRV with
Chasis No. 2HKRW2H85KH669012. The said motion is the subject of the
instant Ruling. The 3rd Defendant deposed that in May, 2021, his mother sent
a Honda CRV to him from the USA to Ghana for him to sell. He attached as
Exhibits 1,2 and 3 photographs of the said vehicle. He added that he paid the
requisite duties and charges on the vehicle and cleared same from the port, he
attached as Exhibit 4 a pho
AI Generated Summary
Delivering a ruling in the Amasaman Circuit Court, Her Honour Enid Marful-Sau addressed an application by the 3rd Defendant to preserve a Honda CRV pending litigation arising from failed transactions between the parties. The Plaintiff initially agreed with the 1st Defendant to buy three shops for GH¢150,000, paid GH¢90,000, and later alleged fraud when documents and a meeting with the shop owner were refused. After police involvement at Kotoku Police Station and the Police Headquarters, the 1st Defendant proposed exchanging his car; the 2nd Defendant brought a Honda CRV, and the Plaintiff paid an additional GH¢85,000, but the vehicle documents were not delivered. The 3rd Defendant, who had consigned the vehicle to the 1st Defendant’s garage, claimed ownership and sought preservation to prevent depreciation. The Plaintiff challenged the court’s jurisdiction based on Order 2 rule 3(2) and signaled discontinuance in favor of a new High Court action. The court held that the address requirement was a waivable irregularity under Order 81, ordered the vehicle’s preservation by delivery to the Registrar within seven days, granted discontinuance without liberty to reapply, and directed that Defendants’ counterclaims proceed as independent actions.