FREDERICK OWONA ODAME VS JANET ODAME & ORS
February 12, 2024
HIGH COURT
GHANA
CORAM
- HER LADYSHIP JUSTICE SARAH ARYEE (MRS.), J.
Areas of Law
- Probate and Succession
- Evidence Law
February 12, 2024
HIGH COURT
GHANA
CORAM
Try asking the following...
The onus is on the propounder of the Will to prove positively that the Will was duly executed, in that it complied with the requirements of sections 1 and 2 of the Wills Act.
1971 (Act 360). BACKGROUND OF THE CASE The plaintiff is one of the children of the late Daniel Kwaku Odame, who died on the 11th of December, 2016. He was 90 years old at the time of his death and was survived by a wife and sixteen children.
The 1st Defendant is the widow of the deceased.
The 2nd and 3rd Defendants are named Executors of the Wills of the deceased which Wills are the subject matter of this suit.
The deceased during his lifetime, acquired properties which included a house, numbered H/No. 147/15 Mataheko Accra, H/No. 28 Mpraeso Eastern Region, and a plot of land at Peikuma near Kasoa.
A search at the High Court revealed that three different Wills deposited at the Court's Registry in the name of the deceased.
The first Will is dated the 7th August 2011, the 2nd dated 21st July 2015 and the 3rd dated 19th April 2016. Probate is yet to be granted to the executors to administer the deceased’s estate.
Following the reading of the Will dated 19th April 2016, Plaintiff initiated this action against the Defendants by a Writ of Summons and Statement of Claim dated the 5th day of June 2018 seeking the following reliefs: a) A Declaration that the late Daniel Kwaku Odame died intestate.
b) A Declaration that the purported Will of the late Daniel Kwaku Odame is invalid since the same was not executed according to law.
c) A Declaration that the alleged Will being attributed to the late Daniel Kwaku Odame by the Defendants is not his original and final Will.
d) An order of perpetual injunction restraining the defendants, their children, agents, and other person(s) claiming title through them from interfering with the property in dispute e) Any other Order(s) that the Honourable Court may deem fit.
The 1st Defendant entered appearance and filed a Statement of Defence on the 28th day of June 2018, this was amended and an amended Statement of Defence was filed on the 9th June 2020. The defendants counterclaimed as follows: a. A Declaration that the late Mr. Daniel Kwaku Odame did not die intestate but the deceased left behind him a valid and properly-executed Will dated 21st July 2015. b. A further Declaration that the Will of the late Mr. Daniel Kwaku Odame dated 21st July 2015 has not been revoked in any way at law by the improperly executed Will dated 19th April 2016 which h
AI Generated Summary
Her Ladyship Justice Sarah Aryee of the High Court adjudicated a probate dispute concerning the late Daniel Kwaku Odame, a 90-year-old who died in December 2016, leaving a widow and sixteen children. A High Court search revealed three wills (2011, 2015, 2016). After the reading of the 2016 will, Odame’s child sued, seeking declarations of intestacy and invalidity, while the widow counterclaimed that the 2015 will was the valid last will. Applying section 2 of the Wills Act, the court held the 2016 will invalid because PW1 and PW2 signed when the testator was absent, a fact admitted by the 1st Defendant and lawyer Abubakari Issah (DW1). The 2015 will was rejected due to contradictions between pleadings and testimony, DW1’s suspect late deposit and demeanor, and the consistent denial by PW1 and PW2. By contrast, the 2011 will was corroborated and timely deposited. The court ruled that Odame did not die intestate, declared the 2011 will his last will, ordered the executors to obtain probate and distribute accordingly, and directed parties to account, with alternative relief if executors are deceased.