FAYOME AHIABLEAME SUING FOR HIMSELF AND ON BEHALF OF THE AFATSAW FAMILY & ANOTHER v. AHORDA GBEVE
January 27, 2023
DISTRICT COURT
GHANA
CORAM
- HIS WORSHIP NELSON DELASI AWUKU, DISTRICT MAGISTRATE
Areas of Law
- Property and Real Estate Law
January 27, 2023
DISTRICT COURT
GHANA
CORAM
Try asking the following...
INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:
Per a Writ of Summons and Statement of Claim filed on the 19
th of March, 2020 and 5th
January, 2021 respectively in this Court, the Plaintiffs prayed for the following reliefs;
a. Declaration of title, recovery of possession and perpetual injunction against the defendant, his
agents, assigns, privies, workmen and all those claiming through him over the land situated,
being and lying at Tekpor near Dzodze and bounded as follows;
i. On one side by Bequin
ii. On one side by Klu Zegedee
iii. On one side by Bequin and
iv. On the last side by Xorlali Adwoub.
b. Damages for trespass
c. Costs
CASE OF THE PLAINTIFFS
The 1st Plaintiff suing for himself and on behalf of the Afatsawo Ahiableame family stated
that the land in dispute was founded by his great grandfather called Torgbui Ahiableame.
The 1
st Plaintiff stated that, his grandfather Torgbui Ahiableame gave birth to Akakpo,
Gbeve and Afatsawo.
The 1st Plaintiff stated that, sometime after the death of his grandfather his properties
were shared for Akakpo, Gbeve and Afatsawo.
The 1st Plaintiff stated that, Kwashie Gbeve, the younger brother of the Defendant once
stole goat meat from a man called Wonder boy and absconded to Kadjebi to escape arrest
and prosecution.
The 1st Plaintiff stated that, based on that development, the father of the defendant
pleaded with Akakpo and Afatsawo to give him a piece of land from their father’s yet to
be shared estates to sell and pay the cost of his son’s offence and they accepted.
The 1st Plaintiff stated that, after the death of Gbeve and Akakpo, Afatsawo decided to
share their late father’s estates among the family.
The 1st Plaintiff stated that, Afatsawo called upon one Peter Ahamah to share the property
among the various families.
The 1st Plaintiff stated that, prior to the sharing, it was agreed that because a piece of the
land was earlier given to Gbeve, a portion of the land due the Gbeve family will be taken
out and sold for the proceeds to be distributed.
The 1st Plaintiff stated that, the defendant alone went to sell a portion of the reserved land
to one Yao Kaleku but his father objected to the sale, so the purchaser came to pay another
amount of GHS 2,500.00 to his father despite having paid the same amount earlier to the
defendant.
The 1st plaintiff stated that the amount of GHS 2,500.00 received by Afatsawo was shared
between members of the family but the Defendant kept the GHS2,500.00 he earlier
AI Generated Summary
In a land dispute over a parcel at Tekpor near Dzodze, the 1st plaintiff, acting for the Afatsawo Ahiableame family, sought declaration of title, recovery of possession, and injunction against the defendant, while the 2nd plaintiff claimed a half plot purchased from Afatsawo. The defendant maintained he sold his own property to carpenter Yao Kaleku for GHS 400 and later conveyed interest to Madam Adzo Ahiagah. The court, relying on testimony from Dumega Peter Ahamah, found the disputed land was reserved during family sharing and not allocated to any one branch, requiring collective consent to alienate. A prior suit (A1/17/2013) was struck out, so res judicata and abuse of process did not apply. Applying Dzefi v. Ablorlor VI, the court held both grants—to the 2nd plaintiff and to Adzo Ahiagah—were void for lack of collective consent. Consequently, plaintiffs lacked capacity to obtain declaration and possession in favour of the Afatsawo family alone, and the defendant’s counterclaim also failed. No costs were awarded.