EILEEN MARY POSCH-ODURO vs DSP RICHMOND BONSU & 4 ORS

In a brief interlocutory ruling during a civil proceeding, His Lordship Emmanuel Amo Yartey (J) considered an evidentiary objection arising during witness testimony. The Court expressly noted that it had critically analyzed submissions made by counsel for the parties. The judge then found that the impugned evidence was already dealt with in the pleadings, specifically identified in paragraphs 4 and 9 of the Statement of Defence filed by the 5th Defendant. On that foundation, the Court overruled the objection. To ensure the evidence could be properly tested, the Court directed that counsel for the Plaintiff may proceed to cross-examine the witness on the issues raised, thereby aligning evidentiary rulings with the scope of the pleadings and adversarial testing.