DR CHARLES KWAME ADOFO v. ESICH LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD & ORS
May 20, 2019
HIGH COURT
GHANA
CORAM
- HIS LORDSHIP JUSTICE DR. RICHMOND OSEI-HWERE
Areas of Law
- Insurance Law
- Civil Procedure
May 20, 2019
HIGH COURT
GHANA
CORAM
Try asking the following...
RULING
On 30th April, 2019 leave was granted to Daniel Aidoo Mensah, the applicant herein (who described himself as the Administrator/Judicial Manager of Esich Life Assurance Company Ltd., the 1st defendant therein) to substitute Esich Life Assurance Company Ltd. In the motion on notice for substitution, the applicant also prayed the court to set aside all court processes subsequent to the protection order that led to his appointment as the so called Administrator/Judicial Manager. The matter was adjourned for the court to hear legal arguments relating to the application to set aside all court processes particularly the garnishee order made subsequent to the appointment of Daniel Aidoo Mensah.
Counsel for the applicant argued that upon an application by the National Insurance Commission, the applicant was appointed as the Judicial Manager/Administrator of Esich Life Assurance by the High Court differently constituted under section 99 of the Insurance Act, 2006 (Act 724). That, an order of protection was made on 25thJanuary, 2019 and the applicant was subsequently appointed by the court on 12th February, 2019. Counsel submitted that per section 101 of Act 724 when a judicial management order is in force all proceedings, execution or other legal processes shall not be commenced or continued against the insurer or its assets. Thus, the garnishee order made on 22nd February, 2019 is invalid, as the court had already appointed the applicant. He invited the court to set aside the garnishee nissi order and halt the execution process against Esich Life Assurance (now substituted by the applicant herein).
In a rebuttal to the submissions of counsel for the applicant, counsel for the plaintiff/respondent (hereinafter called the respondent) submitted that the applicant was appointed under section 180 of Act 724 and not section 99. He submitted that per the applicant’s own showing in Exhibit DAM2, he was appointed as an administrator and that the import of section 180 is that if you apply for a protection order you are appointed as an administrator and not a judicial manager. That, a judicial management order is governed by section 99 of Act 724. He submitted that section 92 of Act 724 also allows the National Insurance Commission to apply to the court for liquidation of an Insurance Company and that per section 6 of Bodies Corporate (Official Liquidations) Act, 1963 (Act 180) there is an automatic stay of proceedings when a liquidator is appointed for companies in
AI Generated Summary
The High Court, per Justice Dr. Richmond Osei-Hwere, ruled on an application by Daniel Aidoo Mensah, appointed to administer Esich Life Assurance Company Ltd. after a protection order sought by the National Insurance Commission (NIC). Mensah argued that his appointment triggered the moratorium in section 101 of the Insurance Act, 2006 (Act 724), rendering invalid a garnishee order issued on 22 February 2019. The respondent countered that Mensah was appointed under section 180, which authorizes an “administrator,” not a “judicial manager,” and does not stay proceedings or execution. Examining Exhibit DAM2 and the statutory scheme, the court found Mensah was appointed as an administrator under section 180. It held that section 180 does not impose an automatic stay, unlike section 101 which applies only during judicial management. Applying expressio unius est exclusio alterius, the court concluded the garnishee order remained valid, declined to halt execution, dismissed the application, and made no order as to costs.