CRYSTAL CITY LIMITED v. BCM GHANA LIMITED
February 23, 2023
COURT OF APPEAL
GHANA
CORAM
- SENYO DZAMEFE J.A (PRESIDING)
- MERLEY A. WOOD (MRS) J.A
- AMMA GAISIE (MRS.) JA
February 23, 2023
COURT OF APPEAL
GHANA
CORAM
Try asking the following...
MERLEY WOOD JA
On or about 5th November, 2010, the Plaintiff/Respondent/Appellant and the
Defendant/Applicant/Respondent entered into a sale and purchase agreement over a
parcel of land owned by the Appellant on the agreed consideration of One Million
Seven Hundred Thousand United States Dollars (US$1,700,000). The Defendant/
Applicant/Respondent paid a deposit of Eight Hundred and Fifty Thousand United
States Dollars (US$850,000.00). When the outstanding payment was not made due to a
misunderstanding, the Plaintiff/Respondent/Appellant sued at the High Court for a
declaration that the failure, refusal and/or neglect of the Defendant to pay the amount
of US$850,000.00 to the Plaintiff offends the terms of the contract between the parties
and therefore constitutes a breach of the contract between the parties; a declaration that
the claim to title to the disputed land without recognition of the right and interest of the
Plaintiff as its grantor constitute a denial of the right and title of the Plaintiff; an order
for recovery of possession of the disputed land upon the Plaintiff’s refund of the deposit
of an amount of US$850,000.00; an order directed at the Land Title Registry to cancel
any certificate of title issued to the Defendant in respect of the disputed land and the
restoration of the title of the Plaintiff in the records of the Land Title Registry; General
damages and costs.
After a full trial, judgment was given on 28th October 2014 in favour of the Plaintiff/
Respondent/Appellant and the court ordered the Defendant/Applicant/Respondent to
pay the outstanding balance with interest thereon from “1st January 2013 to the date of
payment only.” The High Court did not state the interest rate to be applied.
Dissatisfied with the judgment of the High Court, the Defendant/Applicant/Respondent
appealed to this Court. The grounds of appeal among others included the order of
payment of interest on the outstanding amount of US$850,000.00.Meanwhile, the Plaintiff/Respondent/Appellant following the decision of the High
Court filed an Entry of Judgment dated 14th December 2014 found at pages 109 and 110
of the record of appeal. The Entry of Judgment included interest calculated on the
judgment sum at LIBOR rate plus a margin of six per centum (6%) based on the 91 day
Treasury Bill rate prevailing at the time and was duly served on the Respondent. The
Defendant/Appellant/Respondent consequently paid to the Appellant Seven Hundred
and
AI Generated Summary
The dispute arises from a 2010 land sale priced at US$1.7 million between a landowner vendor and a purchaser, where the purchaser paid a US$850,000 deposit but withheld the balance. The landowner sought declarations of breach, recovery of possession conditioned on refund of the deposit, cancellation of any title at the Land Title Registry, damages, and costs. In October 2014 the High Court ordered payment of the outstanding US$850,000 with interest from January 1, 2013, but did not set the rate. The Plaintiff later filed an Entry of Judgment using LIBOR plus a 6% margin; the Defendant paid the principal without interest. After the Court of Appeal dismissed an earlier appeal without fixing a rate, the Plaintiff pursued post-judgment interest and garnishee orders against Ecobank and Access Bank. The High Court set aside the Entry as excessive and directed recalculation using LIBOR 0.23823% without margin. On appeal, Justice Merley A. Wood (with Justices Senyo Dzamefe and Amma A. Gaisie agreeing) held that absent agreement on an interest margin, CI 52 requires the prevailing bank rate at simple interest; adding a 6.585% or “LIBOR plus 6%” rate had no legal foundation. The appeal was dismissed and the High Court’s ruling affirmed.