The Court has heard arguments made by both counsel for and against an application for judgment on admission pursuant to Order 58 of C.I 47. The Court has also perused the affidavit in support and the attachments. The Court has also taken into consideration all the processes on the docket. This Court is of the considered opinion that issues have been set down after pre-trial conference settlement failed and therefore, it would be prudent to allow the matter to take its normal course especially because, the Defendant has no-where specifically admitted the said debts. The application is refused. Subsequently, parties are to agree on an Auditor who would go into accounts and determine the indebtedness of the 1st Defendant/Respondent against the Plaintiff. In this wise, the case would be adjourned for the parties to bring the name of the proposed Auditor as well as file terms of reference for the said Auditor to do the work. The case is adjourned to 30th March, 2023 at 9:00 a.m.
(SGD)
H/L JANE HARRIET AKWELEY QUAYE (MRS.)
(JUSTICE OF THE HIGH COURT)
R.A.
