BOACHIE AGYEMANG PREMPEH AND NANA AMA GYAMERA v. YAW BEKOE
July 18, 2023
DISTRICT COURT
GHANA
CORAM
- HIS WORSHIP STANLEY ADJEI ESQ
Areas of Law
- Evidence Law
- Property and Real Estate Law
July 18, 2023
DISTRICT COURT
GHANA
CORAM
Try asking the following...
JUDGMENT
On 24/03/2023, 1st plaintiff herein issued a writ of summons against the Defendant
seeking the following reliefs:
A. Plaintiff claim from the Defendant a recovery of cash sum of eight Thousand Ghana
cedis (Ghc 8,000.00)
The Court in the course of the matter on its own motion joined the 2nd Plaintiff to the suit
with her consent. The reasoning for this joinder was that 2nd plaintiff testified initially as
pw1 and at the end of the testimony, it appeared to the court that she might have a case
against the Defendant. She was very regular in court and her demeanor painted a picture
that she together with the 1st plaintiff were pursing the matter against the defendant. She was at all material times not party to the suit. Against this background, the court joined
her to the suit as 2
nd plaintiff with her consent.
BACKGROUND TO THE SUIT.
The background to the suit as captured in the summary of the subject-matter to the writ
of summons is that,1st plaintiff is a retired educationist and now a farmer whiles the
Defendant is plaintiff’s cousin with both of them residing in Yamfo.
Further facts are that the 2nd Plaintiff released a portion of her land to him and the
Defendant to cultivate, the 1st plaintiff to cultivate cocoa whiles the Defendant cultivate
plantain. The facts continued in the summary of subject-matter continued that,1st plaintiff
wanted to cultivate the cocoa but Defendant voluntarily accepted to plant the cocoa
seedlings for him. Plaintiff stated further that Newmont Ghana Gold Ltd subsequently
took over the land and for purposes of compensation all his seedlings on the land were
counted and the seedlings amounted to Ghc8,000.00 which the Defendant had claimed
same and refused to give the money to him.
ST Plaintiff continued his account of events that the landowner (2nd plaintiff) severally
advised the Defendant to pay 1st plaintiff his money but defendant willfully refused.
Plea
The Defendant pleaded not liable to the reliefs sought by the plaintiff setting up the
matter for trial.
ISSUES FOR DETERMINATION BY THE COURT.
1. The issue before the court is whether or not the plaintiff proved his case of recovery
of cash sum of Ghc8,000.00 against the Defendant.
2. Whether ,2nd proved any case against the Defendant.
STANDARD OF PROOF, BURDEN OF PROOF AND PERSUATION
A writ of summons as a form of civil litigation, the standard of proof is one on balance of
probabilities or preponderance of probabilities. Pre
AI Generated Summary
This civil action arose from a farming arrangement on land owned by Nana Ama Gyamera (2nd plaintiff) in Yamfo, within Newmont Ghana Gold Ltd’s concession. The 1st plaintiff, a retired educationist and farmer, alleged he supplied cocoa seedlings and that the Defendant, his cousin, agreed to plant them while cultivating plantain. After Newmont assessed and paid compensation, the 1st plaintiff claimed Ghc 8,000 as his 50% share of the cocoa compensation, asserting the cheque was given to the Defendant, who refused to share. Evidence showed the 2nd plaintiff had preexisting crops (mango, cashew, pineapple, teak, palm) and that the Defendant bought and planted cocoa seedlings, corroborated by DW1. Applying the preponderance standard, the court found the 1st plaintiff’s involvement limited to supplying seedlings, dismissed his claim, awarded preexisting-crop compensation to the 2nd plaintiff, and ordered equal sharing of compensation for jointly cultivated crops, with costs against the 1st plaintiff.