Try asking the following...
Try asking the following...
May 16, 2019
HIGH COURT
GHANA
CORAM
RULING
In this motion on notice the Defendant/Applicant (hereinafter called the Applicant) is praying this court for the following:
(1) An order staying the execution and/or further execution of the judgment of the Honourable Court dated February 4, 2014;
(2) An order setting aside the purported writ of summons and statement of claim filed in the above suit on February 24, 2012 as having been issued in clear breach of statutory and time-honored procedural requirements thus making the writ of summons and statement of claim void;
(3) An order setting aside all processes, steps taken and proceedings, including the judgment dated February 4, 2014, as having been respectively filed, undertaken or delivered based on a void writ of summons and statement of claim which could not have properly invoked the jurisdiction of the Honorable Court.
(4) An order setting aside the purported:
(i). ‘Notice of Withdrawal of the Notice of Appeal, filed on the 2nd May, 2014’ filed on 15/11/18;
(ii) Entry of Judgment filed on 15/1/18,
(iii) the order of substituted service granted by Justice Kofi Akrowiah on 15/1/19;
(iv) any, and or all other processes, steps taken or purported to be taken after the order of substituted, as all those steps breached statutory sine qua non and judicial decision binding on the Honorable Court, in terms of the supporting affidavit and annexures attached.
Background to the Application
The background to the application is that on 24/2/2012, the Plaintiff/Respondent (hereinafter called the Respondent) issued a Writ of Summons and Statement of Claim against the Applicant herein for the reliefs as endorsed on the writ of summons. The law office, Dwumfour & Dwumfour, indorsed the writ. The Honourable Court presided over by Her Ladyship Justice Angelina Mensah-Homiah (Mrs) sitting at the Commercial Court ‘1’ Kumasi heard the case and rendered a judgment partly in favour of the Applicant and Respondent herein. Aggrieved by that decision, the Respondent caused a notice of appeal to be filed on 2/5/2014 at the registry of the High Court on its behalf by Sulley Sambian, Esq. of Sarpong and Associates. The Respondent in the said appeal prayed the Court of Appeal to set aside the decision of the Honourable Court.
Subsequent to the above, Abass Amankwah, Esq. filed Entry of Judgment and Notice of Withdrawal of the Notice of Appeal on 2nd May 2014. Having purportedly withdrawn the Notice of Appeal, Abass Amankwah, Esq. attempted unsuccessfully to serve
AI Generated Summary
This High Court ruling by Dr. Richmond Osei-Hwere addresses a post-judgment motion arising from litigation initiated by Dwumfour & Dwumfour in the Kumasi Commercial Court. The Defendant/Applicant sought a stay of execution and to set aside the writ, judgment, entry of judgment, a notice withdrawing an appeal, and a substituted service order. After reviewing Order 2 rule 5 and Order 4 of CI 47 and reconciling divergent Court of Appeal authority, the court favored Clement Otchere v Diana Owusu and held the writ valid, leaving the 4 February 2014 judgment intact. It found that Abass Amankwah’s filings were invalid without a notice of change of lawyer under Act 32 s 26 and Order 75, and that CI 19 Rule 17 requires a Court of Appeal order to withdraw an appeal; therefore the appeal filed by Sulley Sambian remains pending, precluding execution. The substituted service order from Commercial Court 3 was void absent a Chief Justice transfer under Act 459 s 104(1). The stay application was redundant; costs were not awarded.