Eskwai logo
Verify now as a student, judge or newly called lawyer for access to discounted plans.

ALEXANDER AFENYO MARKIN vs SPEAKER OF PARLIAMEN & ANOR

2024

SUPREME COURT

GHANA

CORAM

  • SACKEY TORKORNOO, CJ (PRESIDING) OWUSU JSC LOVELACE – JOHNSON JSC AMADU JSC ASIEDU JSC GAEWU JSC DARKO ASARE JSC

Areas of Law

  • Constitutional Law
  • Civil Procedure

AI Generated Summary

Acting in its original jurisdiction, the Supreme Court was asked to decide whether four sitting MPs vacated their seats when they filed nominations for the 2024 parliamentary elections under political banners different from those on which they entered the 8th Parliament. The majority (Darko Asare JSC writing, joined by the Chief Justice, Owusu JSC and Gaewu JSC, with a separate concurrence by Asiedu JSC) held that Article 97(1)(g) & (h) target real-time ‘floor-crossing’ within the life of a current Parliament, not prospective intentions for a future one. Because the MPs had not switched allegiance while sitting in the 8th Parliament, their seats were not vacant, and the Speaker lacked jurisdiction to declare otherwise. Two justices (Lovelace-Johnson JSC and Tanko Amadu JSC) dissented, reasoning that the Supreme Court lacked jurisdiction, the matter lying in the High Court under Article 99. The Court therefore granted declaratory relief to the plaintiff and restrained the Speaker from treating the seats as vacant.

JUDGEMENT