AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK v. JOSEPH KODUA COMPANY & ORS
2016
HIGH COURT
GHANA
CORAM
- ANGELINA MENSAH-HOMIAH (MRS.) JUSTICE OF THE HIGH COURT
Areas of Law
- Banking and Finance Law
- Civil Procedure
- Evidence Law
- Contract Law
- Corporate Law
2016
HIGH COURT
GHANA
CORAM
AI Generated Summary
The Plaintiff bank sought GH¢ 390,275.56 from the 1st Defendant for unpaid credit facilities and interest, with guarantees from the 2nd and 3rd Defendants. The 1st and 2nd Defendants' failure to comply with court directions resulted in their defenses being struck out. The court found in favor of the Plaintiff and awarded GH¢ 387,497.82, along with prevailing bank rate interest from 1/11/2014 to final payment, and costs of GH¢ 20,000.00 against the 1st and 2nd Defendants. Legal principles discussed included the onus of proof in civil cases, corporate legal personality, enforceability of indemnities, and award of interest.
JUDGMENT
This is a debt recovery action in which the Plaintiff bank seeks to recover an amount of GH¢ 390, 275.56 arising from unpaid credit facility granted by the plaintiff to the 1st Defendant and interest thereon from 1/11/2014 to the date of final payment. Details of the grant of the credit facility and the events leading to the default are adequately captured in the Plaintiff's statement of claim filed on 28/01/15.
The 1st and 2nd defendants caused their solicitor to enter appearance on their behalf on 27/02/2015 and he proceeded to file a defence. However, the 3rd Defendant was served with the writ of summons and statement of claim by substituted service by an order of this court dated 18/03/2016 but he failed to enter appearance.
After the pre-trial stage, the court gave further directions as to the filing of witness statements.
Counsel for the 1st and 2nd Defendants who was not in court at the time orders were made for the filing of witness statements was duly served with the court notes on 28/01/2016 (see affidavit of service sworn on 28/01/2016). Subsequently, the Plaintiff's witness statement and numerous hearing notices were served on their counsel to attend Case Management Conference but he elected not to come to court and his clients did not also file their witness statements.
At the case management stage, the defence filed by the 1st and 2nd Defendants was struck out under Order 32 rule 7A (3) (b) of C.I. 47 as amended by C.I. 87. Thereafter, the Plaintiff was called upon to prove its claim against the 1st and 2nd Defendants. The sole issue set down for trial is whether or not the Plaintiff is entitled to its claim.
At the trial, the Relationship Manager of the Plaintiff/bank, Shirley Wiafe Ameyaw, testified on its behalf. She relied on her witness statement filed on 18/1/16. In her testimony, the Plaintiff's representative said the bank extended an overdraft facility (O/D) of GH¢ 200,000.00 and two term loans totaling GH¢ 187,802.80 at an interest rate of 39.92% per annum to the 1st Defendant. In respect of the repayment of those credit facilities, she told the court that the O/D was to be repaid within a period of twelve months and the two term loans of GH¢ 160,000.00 and GH¢ 27,802.80 were to be liquidated within 24 and 9 months respectively. These terms, according to the witness, were accepted by the 1st Defendant acting through its Managing Director, the 2nd Defendant. Continuing, the witness indicated that the 2nd and 3rd Defend