ABEIFAA KARBO JENNIFER v. MANDAK ADJEI
March 17, 2023
DISTRICT COURT
GHANA
CORAM
- HIS WORSHIP D. ANNAN ESQ
Areas of Law
- Contract Law
- Civil Procedure
- Evidence Law
March 17, 2023
DISTRICT COURT
GHANA
CORAM
Try asking the following...
JUDGMENT
INTRODUCTION
1. This judgment relates to contract.
2. The plaintiff describes herself as a businesswoman. On 20th September, 2022 the
plaintiff instituted this action against the defendant for the following reliefs:
a. An order for the recovery of the sum of GHS8,475.00 being the balance due
and owing by defendant when defendant collected GHS10,000.00 from
plaintiff for a joint business for which the defendant failed to honour but
only paid GHS1,525.00 leaving a balance of GHS8,475.00.
b. Interest on the principal amount of GHS8,475.00 at the prevailing
commercial bank rate.
c. Costs.”
3. On 3
rd October, 2022 the defendant stated that he had paid GHS6,250.00 out of the
GHS10,000.00 hence liable only to the sum of GHS3,750.00. The plaintiff disputed
defendant’s assertion. The court then entered judgment on admission in favour of the
plaintiff for the recovery of the GHS3,750.00.
4. This judgment, therefore, regards the amount in dispute which stands at GHS6,250.00.
The parties were encouraged to settle, but they returned that they were unable to
settle.
5. The respective cases of the parties herein are detailed below.
PLAINTIFF’S CASE
6. According to the plaintiff on 7
th June, 2021 at about 4:00pm she entered into a joint
venture with the defendant to deal in timber. She stated that she gave out
GHS10,000.00 as seed capital. Also, the parties agreed to share profits 2:1 where she
was entitled to 2/3 and the defendant 1/3. She added that in July 2022 the business
yielded profit of GHS1,500.00 where defendant paid into her mobile money account
the amount of GHS300.00. Later, she went to the shop and requested for 20 pieces of
wood which costed GHS600.00. She stated further that the business on the second
consignment yielded a profit of GHS1,500.00. Again, the defendant paid GHS300.00
into her account. Also, she engaged defendant to repair some fittings in her home
which costed GHS300.00. She added that the defendant, however, failed to pay her
the of GHS400.00 being the remaining balance of her share of the GHS1,500.00 profit.
Not satisfied, she confronted the defendant. But the defendant indicated that the
business was not good. Hence, she demanded for the return of her capital the
GHS10,000.00. She indicated that the defendant admitted owing her the
GHS10,000.00, in the presence of one Pastor and a friend by name Richard. She
admitted that defendant then paid GHS525.00 through the pastor to her. Later t
AI Generated Summary
This Magistrate Court judgment concerns a business dispute arising from a joint timber venture. The plaintiff, a businesswoman, provided GHS10,000 as seed capital under a profit-sharing arrangement. After two consignments generated profits and partial payments, she demanded the return of her capital when the venture faltered. The defendant admitted owing GHS10,000 in the presence of a pastor and Richard, but claimed additional payments and benefits reduced the outstanding sum. The court had previously entered judgment on admission for GHS3,750 and addressed the remaining controversy of GHS6,250. Applying principles of civil evidence, the court found the plaintiff’s varying computations did not meet the burden of proof for a larger recovery. Relying on the defendant’s admissions and payment history, the court held only GHS200 remained due, awarded interest at the prevailing bank rate, and made no order as to costs.