Eskwai logo
Verify now as a student, judge or newly called lawyer for access to discounted plans.

YANKAH AND OTHERS v. ADMINISTRATOR-GENERAL AND ANOTHER

1971

COURT OF APPEAL

CORAM

  • APALOO J.S.C.
  • JIAGGE
  • SOWAH JJ.A

Areas of Law

  • Probate and Succession
  • Evidence Law
  • Civil Procedure

AI Generated Summary

The Supreme Court, per Apaloo J.S.C., dismissed an appeal arising from a probate dispute over the codicil of J. T. N. Yankah, an eminent schoolmaster who died on 7 September 1964. After executing a will in January 1963 through Mr. Caseley-Hayford, Yankah wrote and executed a codicil on 6 September 1964 that altered the remainder of his new two-storeyed house to favor his only daughter, Hagar Nana Yankah, and her children, and made pecuniary bequests to five sons. The Administrator-General had obtained ex parte probate of the will and codicil in the High Court, Accra. Four of Yankah’s sons, acting as next friends of their infant children whose interests were extinguished, sued the executor and Hagar to compel proof of the codicil in solemn form and, failing that, to revoke probate. The Supreme Court held the 1965 grant was in common form, confirmed authority to compel solemn proof, found due execution and attestation based on evidence and presumptions, pronounced for the codicil in solemn form, and dismissed the appeal with costs.

Judgement