VANDERPUIJE v. AKWEI
February 3, 1971
HIGH COURT
GHANA
CORAM
- HAYFRON-BENJAMIN J
Areas of Law
- Civil Procedure
- Constitutional Law
- Property and Real Estate Law
February 3, 1971
HIGH COURT
GHANA
CORAM
Try asking the following...
JUDGMENT OF HAYFRON-BENJAMIN J.
This is an application against an order of this court that the proceedings in this case should be continued notwithstanding an appeal by the plaintiff to the Court of Appeal from a ruling of this court dismissing an application by him for judgment on alleged admissions by the defendant.
Rule 27 of the Supreme Court Rules, 1962 (L.I. 218), as amended by the Court of Appeal (Amendment) Rules, 1969 (L.I. 618), provides that an appeal against any judgment or decision shall operate as a stay of execution or of proceedings under the judgment or decision appealed from except so far as the court below or the court may otherwise order.
This legislative instrument came into force at a time when appeals against interlocutory judgments and orders were by special leave, and the High Court therefore had some control over appeals in such matters, and consequently some control over proceedings pending before them. With the coming into force of the Constitution, 1969, the position, it is suggested, has altered considerably. Article 110 (2) of the Constitution provides that, "Save as otherwise provided in this Constitution, an appeal shall lie as of right from a judgment, decree or order of the High Court of Justice to the Court of Appeal in any cause or matter determined by the High Court of Justice." By article 172 of the Constitution a judgment includes an order or decree.
[p.245]
The matters for initial consideration here are (a) whether the ruling appealed against was made in a cause or matter determined by this court or merely a ruling made in a cause or matter pending in this court for determination; (b) if it is a ruling made in a cause determined by this court, whether it is a judgment or decision so as to come within the provisions of the Court of Appeal (Amendment) Rules, 1969 (L.I. 618), or is merely an order, and (c) whether an interlocutory appeal operates as a stay of proceedings of the whole substantive case, or merely proceedings under the decision itself, e.g. where there is a grant of interim injunction and an appeal is lodged against that order, whether the whole trial comes to a halt or only proceedings and court processes under that decision granting the interim injunction. Order 1, r. 1 of the Supreme [High] Court (Civil Procedure) Rules, 1954 (L.N. 140A), defines "cause" as including any action, suit or other original proceedings between plaintiff and defendant and "matter" as including every proceeding in cou
AI Generated Summary
Hayfron-Benjamin J. addressed whether High Court proceedings should continue despite a pending appeal from the courts refusal to enter judgment on alleged admissions under Order 14. The court analyzed Rule 27 of the Supreme Court Rules (L.I. 218) as amended by L.I. 618, and Article 110(2) of the 1969 Constitution, distinguishing judgments and decisions from procedural orders. He held that the refusal to enter judgment on admissions neither determined the cause nor affected parties rights; therefore L.I. 618 could only stay proceedings under the appealed order, not halt the case. Finding no fruits of victory to protect and considering affidavits on hardship and the risk of a nugatory appeal, the court exercised discretion to allow the substantive land dispute to proceed, fixed a hearing date (8 February 1971), and made no order as to costs.