THEOPHILUS DONKOR v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
June 12, 2019
SUPREME COURT
CORAM
- AKUFFO (MS), CJ (PRESIDING)
- DOTSE, JSC
- GBADEGBE, JSC
- BENIN, JSC
- MARFUL-SAU, JSC
- AMEGATCHER, JSC
- KOTEY, JSC
Areas of Law
- Constitutional Law
- Administrative Law
June 12, 2019
SUPREME COURT
CORAM
AI Generated Summary
The Supreme Court of Ghana, per Kotey, JSC, resolved a constitutional challenge to the Presidential (Transition) Act, 2012 (Act 845), focusing on whether members of governing boards of public corporations and executive heads can be removed automatically upon a presidential transition. Applying a purposive interpretive method and surveying constitutional provisions (Articles 70, 190, 191, 195, 297) and constitutive statutes for bodies such as the University of Ghana, National Petroleum Authority, Forestry Commission, Securities and Exchange Commission, and National Pensions Regulatory Authority, the Court held that members appointed under Article 70(1)(d)(iii) to governing bodies are not members of the public services and may be removed at will by the President. Conversely, permanent staff and executive heads appointed under Article 195 are public officers protected by Article 191(b) and removable only per their appointment terms or for just cause. Section 14 of Act 845 is to be read restrictively: it does not dissolve boards, applies only to presidential/ministerial appointees, and is unconstitutional insofar as it purports to oust executive heads upon transition. State companies and constitutional governing bodies fall outside its reach. All other Justices concurred in Kotey, JSC’s reasoning and conclusions.
KOTEY, JSC:-
1.0 Introduction
By a writ of summons issued on 4th January 2017, the Plaintiff invoked the original jurisdiction of this court pursuant to Articles 2 (1) and 130 seeking certain reliefs. The said writ was amended pursuant to leave of this court granted on the 8th March 2017. The Plaintiff therefore filed an amended writ and statement of case on 10th March 2017. The Defendant filed an amended Statement of case on 23rd March 2019. The following reliefs are indorsed on the amended writ.
1. A declaration that the removal from office of such Chief Executives, Chief Executive Officers, Director-Generals (howsoever called) and members of governing boards of public corporations merely on account of the assumption of office of the person elected as President of the Republic of Ghana does not amount to a just cause and is accordingly unconstitutional;
2. A declaration that to the extent that section 14 of the Presidential (Transition) Act 2012 (Act 845) requires all Chief Executives, Chief Executive Officers, Director-Generals (howsoever called) and members of governing boards of public corporations to cease to hold office merely on account of the assumption of office of the person elected as President of the Republic of Ghana, the said section 14 is unconstitutional as being inconsistent with the letter and spirit of the Constitution, particularly Articles 70(1)(d)(iii), 190 and/or 191(b) of the Constitution;
3. An order of perpetual injunction restraining any person or authority from removing from office such Chief Executives, Chief Executive Officers, Director-Generals (howsoever called) and members of governing boards of public corporations merely on account of the assumption of office of the person elected as President of the Republic of Ghana.
1.1 Memorandum of Agreed Issues
The parties filed the following joint memorandum of agreed issues on the 9th May 2017.
1. Whether and to what extent the public services of Ghana as defined under Article 190 of the 1992 Constitution are separate from and/or independent of the executive authority of Ghana.
2. Whether or not the expression “a member of the public services” as used in Article 191 of the 1992 Constitution affects members of the governing boards of public corporations appointed pursuant to Articles 70(1)(d)(iii), 190(1)(b) and 190(3) of the 1992 Constitution.
3. Whether or not the President of the Republic of Ghana in line with Article 297(a) of the 1992 Constitution has the legal