THE BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF EBENEZER SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL VS ATORNEY GENERAL & ANOR
2024
HIGH COURT
GHANA
CORAM
- HIS LORDSHIP ALEXANDER OSEI TUTU (J.)
Areas of Law
- Administrative Law
- Property and Real Estate Law
- Civil Procedure
2024
HIGH COURT
GHANA
CORAM
AI Generated Summary
This case involves a dispute over a 45-acre land, where the Plaintiff sought an Interlocutory Injunction against the Defendants, claiming possession title. The court declined to grant the injunction, citing precedents against granting such injunctions to statutory entities. The court emphasized that adverse possession doesn't apply to State Land and that the balance of convenience favored the government's plan to use the land for a public hospital project. The decision highlights the complexities of property disputes involving state-owned land and the courts' reluctance to interfere with government projects through injunctions.
The Plaintiff in this Application is praying for an Order of Interlocutory Injunction restraining the Defendants and their Officers, agents, assigns, workmen and Contractors etc. , from interfering with any portion of its forty-five acre land pending the determination of the suit.
According to the Plaintiff, it has been in possession of the subject matter land for over twelve years and that confers possession title on it by virtue of Section 10 of the Limitation Act, 1972. The Application was opposed by the 2nd Defendant, arguing that the subject matter land is a State Land acquired under an Executive Instrument (Exhibit ‘MC’) which was subsequently leased to the State Housing Company, a State entity, since 1996. The Company has exercised rights of ownership over the land together with the other adjoining lands owned by the State.
The Respondent denies the ownership of the Plaintiff and contends that adverse possession cannot be exercised over a State Land by virtue of the law. (See Section 236 of Act 1036) After carefully considering the Application and the submission of both Counsel, I regret to say that I am unable to accede to the request and prayer of the Applicant.
As a matter of fact, the Courts have hesitated to grant Interlocutory Injunctions against statutory entities. (See WELFORD QUARCOO VR A. G. AND ANOR) [2012], SCGLR 259 AT 260, YAW OSAFO MARFO VRS EOCO [2012] 45 GMJ 85 AT 92–93, REPUBLIC BRS HIGH COURT (FAST TRACK DIVISION) ACCRA, EXPARTE; GHANA LOTTO OPERATIONS ASSOCIATION (NATIONAL LOTTERY AUTHORITY – INTERESTED PARTY) [2009] SCGLR 372 AT 400 AND RANSFORD FRANCE (NO. 1) VRS E. C. AND A. G. [2012] 1 SCGLR 689 AT HOLDING 1. The Applicant could not demonstrate that on the balance of convenience, it stands to suffer greater hardship.
The Respondent claims the Government requires the land, which it owns, for an Ultra-modern Hospital Project for the benefit of the people in the Municipality.
To injunct the Government at this stage on its own land does not seem to me to be right, without prejudice to the Applicant to ventilate its possessory claim in the substantive matter.
In light of the above, I decline to grant the Plaintiff’s Application for Interlocutory Injunction.
(SGD. ) H/L ALEXANDER OSEI TUTU JUSTICE OF THE HIGH COURT.