ROSE OKRAKU AND MARTHA RIBEIRO v. EBENEZER ASARE AND LANDS COMMISSION
2022
HIGH COURT
GHANA
CORAM
- HIS LORDSHIP ALEX OWUSUOFORI (J
Areas of Law
- Property and Real Estate Law
- Evidence Law
- Civil Procedure
- Tort Law
2022
HIGH COURT
GHANA
CORAM
AI Generated Summary
This Ghanaian High Court land dispute centers on the late Major (Rtd.) Samuel Boafo Okraku’s alleged ownership of a 0.15-acre plot at McCarthy Hill, Accra. His widow and daughter, acting as administrators of his estate, sought declarations of title, an injunction, and damages for trespass against the purchaser, supported by the Land Title Registry/Lands Commission as 2nd Defendant. Plaintiffs relied on a 1968 conveyance from Joseph George Sackey and a 2007 search confirming that document. The 1st Defendant asserted a grant from the Gbawe Kwartei family in 2011, tendered historical judgments establishing the family’s allodial title, and claimed the land was bare when acquired. The court emphasized the burden of proof, the evidentiary effect of recitals in written instruments (binding only between parties), and the nemo dat principle. It found Plaintiffs failed to prove the James Town Stool’s title or any grant to Sackey from that stool, accepted DW1’s testimony for the Gbawe Kwartei family, and concluded the 1st Defendant obtained a valid grant and registered title, dismissing Plaintiffs’ claims with costs.
J U D G M E N T
1.0 One major (Rtd.) Samuel Boafo Okraku, hereinafter to be
referred to as “the Deceased” died on 3rd October 2005. The
Plaintiffs who are the widow and a daughter respectively of the
deceased sued the Defendants in their acquired capacities as
Administratrixes of the Estate of the deceased. Their case was
that the deceased acquired and died possessed of a 0.15 acre
land at McCarthy Hill.
2.0 Apparently, the 1st Defendant also claimed to have purchased
the disputed land hence Plaintiffs’ suit against the Defendants
wherein they sought by way of reliefs that by virtue of being
the Administratrixes of the Estate of the deceased the court
should declare that they are entitled to administer the Estate of
the deceased and for that matter they are also entitled to
administer the 0.15 acre land, the description of which was well
particularized on the endorsement of the Writ and the
Statement of Claim.
3.0 As a corollary to the above relief, Plaintiffs also sought
declaration that the deceased was the lawful owner of the said
0.15acre land situate and being at McCarthy Hill in Accra.
4.0 Plaintiffs in addition sought an order of perpetual injunction to
restrain 1st Defendant from entering the said land as well as
damages for trespass against the 1st Defendant.
PLAINTIFFS’ CASE
5.0 Plaintiffs are the widow and daughter respectively of the
deceased and the lawful administrators of the deceased’s estate.
6.0 Plaintiffs’ case is that the deceased was the lawful owner of
0.15acres of land situate at McCarthy Hill on the AccraWinneba Road (Land), which he acquired by a deed of
conveyance dated 8th March 1968, made between one Joseph
George Sackey and the deceased (1968 conveyance) Plaintiffs
add that in January 1989, the deceased conveyed part of the
land, that is 0.35 acres, to a certain Mohammed Byrouthy, but
continued to be the lawful owner of the remaining 0.15acres,
the property.
7.0 According to Plaintiffs, on 7th February 2007, they were granted
Letters of Administration to administer the deceased’s estate.
They subsequently conducted a search on the property at 2nd
Defendant and the search results dated 10th December 2007
confirmed the 1968 conveyance. Plaintiffs add that in February
2013, they requested 2nd Defendant to conduct another search
on the property. However, the search results dated 15th March
2013 did not include information on the 1968 conveyance.
Thus, by a letter dated 22nd March 2013, they