Riss Henry Okaikwei v. Nathaniel Azuma Nelson & ANOTHER
2021
COURT OF APPEAL
GHANA
CORAM
- Welbourne (Mrs), J.A. (Presiding)
- Aryene (Mrs), J.A.
- Baah, J.A.
Areas of Law
- Civil Procedure
- Property and Real Estate Law
- Probate and Succession
- Evidence Law
2021
COURT OF APPEAL
GHANA
CORAM
AI Generated Summary
The Court of Appeal (Justice Eric Baah authoring, with Justices Margaret Welbourne and Novisi Aryene concurring) dismissed an appeal arising from a High Court judgment in a land dispute over a 0.25‑acre plot at Odorkor Tsuim/A Lang, Accra. The Appellant repeatedly defaulted under the High Court (Civil Procedure) Rules, C.I. 47, leading first to his amended defence and counterclaim being struck out, then later reinstated with stringent case management directions: a witness statement to be filed within seven days and punitive costs of GH¢20,000 payable within seven days, made a condition precedent to filing any process. On appeal, the Appellant abandoned the “weight of evidence” ground and argued (i) the Respondent lacked capacity because he did not plead being a personal representative and allegedly had no letters of administration, and (ii) the costs condition violated audi alteram partem. The Court held capacity is a legal question that cannot be raised in a vacuum; the Respondent’s uncontested inter vivos gift and Act 63 s.1(2)(a) vested the property in the customary successor, enabling him to sue. The Court further held Order 74 allows immediate punitive costs with conditions; enforcement of conditions is distinct from execution under Order 43. The appeal was dismissed with GH¢5,000 costs.
BAAH, J.A
BACKGROUND
Defendant/Appellant, hereafter Appellant, conducted his case by default. He was in perpetual defiance of the procedural commands of the High Court (Civil Procedure Rules), C.I. 47. A recital of the monumental and unbroken chain of defaults is imperative. Plaintiff/Respondent, hereafter Respondent, issued his writ of summons with a statement of claim on 12th December, 2013. Respondent submitted to the jurisdiction of the court by the filing of an entry of appearance on 8th January, 2014. This was followed by a statement of defence on 12th March, 2014. Issues for trial were settled on 7th May, 2014, with an order for parties to file and exchange documents to be used at the trial. Whereas Appellant filed (only) his documents to be used on 24th November, 2014, Respondent and his witness filed witness statements with documentary annexures on 14th April, 2016. With leave of the court, an amended statement of defence was filed by Appellant on 10th February, 2017.
The suit was adjourned to 10th March, 2017 but Appellant and counsel did not turn up. At the next sitting of 28th March, 2017, counsel for Appellant failed to turn up despite having been served with a hearing notice. The suit was adjourned to 2nd May, 2017 for Case Management. Despite being served with a hearing notice and the court notes, counsel for Appellant again failed to show up in court. The case was then adjourned to 4th May, 2017 for continuation of the Case Management. Counsel for Respondent filed a motion on 16th May, 2017, for an order striking out Appellant’s amended statement of defence and counterclaim under Order 32 Rule 7A (3) (b), C.I 47, as amended by C. I 47. On 12th June, 2017, when Appellant and his counsel failed to attend court, the court granted the application and struck out his amended statement of defence and counterclaim.
After some adjournments, the Respondent with leave of the court testified on 14th July, 2017. The case was adjourned to 27th July, 2017 and subsequently to 10th October, 2017 for cross-examination. When Appellant and his counsel failed to turn up on 10th October, 2017, Respondent was ordered to file his written address which was done on 20th October, 2017. On 27th October, 2017, the court ordered the written address of Respondent and a hearing notice to be served on Appellant. The case was then adjourned for judgment.
The road to judgment was truncated by a motion on notice by Appellant, praying for an order re-listing the statement