Eskwai logo
Verify now as a student, judge or newly called lawyer for access to discounted plans.

REPUBLIC v. HIGH COURT, EX PARTE: MALIK IBRAHIM & ANOR

2023

SUPREME COURT

GHANA

CORAM

  • PWAMANG JSC (PRESIDING)
  • LOVELACE-JOHNSON (MS) JSC
  • AMADU JSC
  • PROF. MENSA-BONSU (MRS.) JSC
  • KOOMSON JSC

Areas of Law

  • Administrative Law
  • Constitutional Law
  • Criminal Law and Procedure
  • Civil Procedure

AI Generated Summary

In a supervisory jurisdiction application, Malik Ibrahim challenged two High Court orders confirming and varying an EOCO asset-freezing directive issued after EOCO investigated alleged revenue losses at Pacific Oil Ghana Limited (POGL), run by his brother Alhaji Zakaria Ibrahim. EOCO arrested Malik and other managers, and claimed assets in Maliks name were proceeds of stealing and money laundering. The High Court confirmed the freezing order and later appointed a receiver/manager and defrosted accounts to keep filling stations running. Malik argued EOCO exceeded its mandate under Act 804 and raised procedural defects. The Supreme Court, per Amadu JSC, held EOCO is a specialised agency whose statutory remit does not include investigating ordinary theft from a private entity; the facts did not constitute organised crime, and money laundering could not bootstrap EOCOs jurisdiction over the predicate theft. Exercising supervisory jurisdiction, the Court quashed the 2 March and 18 April 2023 orders, refused prohibition, and affirmed that ex parte confirmation under Section 34(1) is permissible.

RULING