REPUBLIC v. TEKPERBIAWE DIVISIONAL COUNCIL AND ANOTHER; EX PARTE NENE KORLE II
1971
HIGH COURT
GHANA
CORAM
- ABBAN J
Areas of Law
- Administrative Law
- Civil Procedure
- Constitutional Law
1971
HIGH COURT
GHANA
CORAM
AI Generated Summary
The High Court, per Abban J., considered an application by the recognised Tekperbiawe divisional chief of Big Ada seeking certiorari and prohibition to quash destoolment proceedings dated 20 April 1971 and to restrain the Tekperbiawe Divisional Council and Ada Traditional Council from suspending or destooling him. After certain elders—led by C. O. C. Amartey—purportedly convened proceedings under L.I. 309 and found a prima facie case, the Ada Traditional Council heard the matter, overruled the chief’s procedural objection, and declared him destooled. The respondents raised a preliminary objection that chieftaincy matters fall within the Traditional Council’s exclusive jurisdiction under section 15(1) of the Chieftaincy Act, 1971 and sections 52 and 113 of the Courts Act, 1971. Abban J. held that, while merits lie exclusively with Traditional Councils, the High Court’s common law supervisory jurisdiction remains, preserved by article 114 of the 1969 Constitution and not ousted except by clear statutory words. Accordingly, the preliminary objection was overruled.
JUDGMENT OF ABBAN J.
The application before the court is for the writ of certiorari directing the respondents, Tekperbiawe Divisional Council and the Ada Traditional Council to bring up to this court certain proceedings dated 20 April 1971 for the same to be quashed. The applicant further prays for an order prohibiting the two respondents from suspending him or declaring him destooled from his office as a divisional chief.
The events which led to this application are set out in the affidavits filed. The contents of these affidavits show that the applicant had been the recognised divisional chief of Tekperbiawe division of Big Ada, and in November 1970, some members or sections of the said divisional stool led by one Korle Gbettor intending to destool the applicant preferred destoolment charges against him. The charges were lodged with certain elders of the Tekperbiawe divisional stool, and this procedure, on the face of it, purported to comply with the Chieftaincy (Destoolment Proceedings) Regulations, 1963 (L.I. 309),
The following are some of the provisions of L.I. 309:
“1. (1) Every Traditional Council shall for its area make and forward to the Minister a list of the names and any customary posts or titles of all persons who are entitled by custom to give final approval to the destoolment of a Chief.
[p.203]
(2) For the purpose of these Regulations, the expression ‘elder’ means a person whose name appears on the list forwarded to the Minister under the preceding sub-regulations.
2. A claim or complaint against a Chief may be lodged with an elder of the Stool concerned who shall, within fourteen days of the lodging, summon all the other elders concerned to hear the claim or complaint.
3. At any meeting of the elders concerned,
(a) the elder summoning the meeting shall be the chairman;
(b) the quorum shall be half the number of the elders concerned;
(c) decisions shall be by a simple majority of elders present; and
(d) the chairman shall have an additional or casting vote in the event of an equality of votes.
4. (1) The meeting may dismiss the claim or complaint summarily but where the meeting decides that a prima facie case has been made out against the Chief it shall forward a copy of the claim or complaint together with the decision thereon to the Traditional Council and the elders shall have the right, to the exclusion of any other person, to appear before the Traditional Council in the exercise of its jurisdiction under section 15 o