Anin J.A. delivered the judgment of the court. Kobina Akrong, a farmer, was walking from Nkum to Perkyerakyer, a cottage near Swedru, early in the morning of 10 October 1970. On the way he met the first appellant, accompanied by Kwesi Assani, the fourth witness for the prosecution, walking in the opposite direction. At the invitation of the first appellant, Akrong accompanied him to the house of Kobina Ahama (the sixth witness for the prosecution) at Perkyerakyer and the fourth witness for the prosecution followed them later.
A prosecution witness Kwesi Ankomah, the fifth witness for the prosecution, recalled seeing his two grandchildren, the first appellant and Kobina Akrong, on the day in question quarrelling as they entered Perkyerakyer. He explained that they were quarrelling over a cocoa farm devised by the late Kofi Nkum (the first appellant's father) to his wife and children, which had been pledged by one Sackey ( the executor of the will and caretaker of the farm) to Akrong. The first appellant insisted on the farm being redeemed immediately from the pledge; but Akrong was adamant. After a heated verbal exchange in the course of which the first appellant is alleged to have abused Akrong calling him "a fool, a goat and a person having no sense," and to have threatened to beat him up, the combatants were calmed down.
Another witness, the sixth witness for the prosecution, Kobina Ahama, brother of the fifth witness for the prosecution, described in detail how he was interrupted in his bamboo cutting near the bush path on the day in question and was forced to return to his house at Perkyerakyer with the first appellant and Akrong as they exchanged words with each other. Fearing the worst, the sixth witness for the prosecution returned with them to his house and heard the first appellant first complain bitterly about Akrong's action in pledging his late father's cocoa farm; and then announce that he had recovered possession of the pledged farm. Akrong challenged him for taking that unilateral action since he was a co-owner of the farm. At this retort, the first appellant became enraged and heaped [p.293] more abuses on Akrong; but the latter retaliated in kind. The sixth witness for the prosecution recalled that it was at this juncture in the heated exchanges that the first appellant threatened Akrong thus: "You say I am afraid, if you will go to your village we will see; if you will not go to your village we will see." (The emphasis is ours.)
When