1. This court has heard 1st Defendant on her motion and has perused the motion paper and the deposition in support.
Exhibits “FA” and “B” annexed are apposite, andcorroborate the averments of the applicant.
And I find and hold that lawyer Tawiah Yoyowah isnot licensed to practice law at the relevant datesmentioned in the letter from the General legalcounsel.
Indeed, the writ taken on 08-10-2018 has no solicitors’ license endorsed on it.
This being the case Ex parte Teriwajah and anothersimilar cases are applicable.
This action commenced without compliance withsection 8(2) of Act 32, the legal Profession Act isa nullity and I declare it as such.
2. Cost of GH¢5, 000. 00 is awarded in favour of 1st Defendants applicant and against the Plaintiff. (SGD. )H/L NICHOLAS M. C. ABODAKPIJUSTICE OF THE HIGH COURT.
