Eskwai logo
Verify now as a student, judge or newly called lawyer for access to discounted plans.

NARTEY v. THE REPUBLIC

September 9, 1981

COURT OF APPEAL

GHANA

CORAM

  • FRANCOIS
  • EDWARD WIREDU JJ.A.
  • OKAI J

Areas of Law

  • Criminal Law and Procedure
  • Evidence Law

AI Generated Summary

Edward Wiredu J.A., delivering the Court of Appeals judgment, allowed the appeal by Robert Nartey against his 1980 High Court, Accra jury conviction for the murder of Amadu Fulani. The court summarised Narteys account: Fulani confronted him over land use, struck him with a stick, then cut him with a cutlass; Nartey, bleeding, feared for his life and swung a cutlass while attempting to escape, after which Fulani fell. No independent witnesses existed; the case turned on Narteys cautioned statement and testimony. The appellate court held the trial judge misdirected the jury by confusing self-defence with provocation, by suggesting Nartey had overpowered and “butchered” Fulani without evidential basis, and by failing to review the evidence and tie legal standards to the facts. Properly directed, a reasonable jury would have acquitted on self-defence. The court quashed the conviction and death sentence and substituted an acquittal.

JUDGEMENT