Eskwai logo
Verify now as a student, judge or newly called lawyer for access to discounted plans.

MORO v. THE REPUBLIC

1978

HIGH COURT

GHANA

CORAM

  • ROGER KORSAH J

Areas of Law

  • Criminal Law and Procedure
  • Evidence Law

AI Generated Summary

This appellate judgment concerns Hamidu Moro, an Arabic teacher, convicted of possessing Indian hemp under Ghanas Pharmacy and Drugs Act, 1961 (Act 64). The prosecutions narrative began when Constable Daniel Akyaa, traveling from Atebubu to Sunyani, smelled Indian hemp after Moro boarded a vehicle at Ejura with a reddish bag. At Mampong police barrier, Akyaa involved Corporal Essilfi Omane Agyekum; Moro brought the bag to the charge office, opened it at police request, and leaves suspected to be Indian hemp were found and later confirmed by the government analyst. When cautioned, Moro said he would give his statement in court. On appeal, Moro argued the trial judge wrongly inferred guilt from his silence. The court reviewed English and Jamaican authorities, reaffirming that silence alone is not evidence or corroboration but may in exceptional circumstances attract adverse comment where independent evidence exists. Finding independent proof of Moros possession through ownership of the bag, the court dismissed the appeal.

JUDGEMENT