Eskwai logo
Verify now as a student, judge or newly called lawyer for access to discounted plans.

MOHAMMED HAMIDU v. REPUBLIC

April 30, 2019

COURT OF APPEAL

GHANA

CORAM

  • MARIAMA OWUSU J.A. (PRESIDING)
  • DZAMEFE, J. A.
  • WELBOURNE (MRS), J. A

Areas of Law

  • Criminal Law and Procedure
  • Evidence Law
  • Constitutional Law

AI Generated Summary

Margaret Welbourne JA, writing for the Court of Appeal, upheld the conviction and thirty-year sentence of Mohammed Amidu, a motor repairer, for conspiracy to commit robbery and robbery at a galamsey site near Manso-Nkwanta. On 19 August 2011, Amidu and an accomplice, unmasked and armed with a pump-action gun, confronted George Sarpong and Prince Morris Manu, threatened them—asking “Are you ready to lose your life?”—and forcibly took a waist bag containing 54 pounds of gold valued at GH¢40,000 before fleeing on an unregistered Haodjin motorbike. Both complainants independently identified Amidu to police and in court. Addressing grounds alleging failure to prove guilt, excessiveness of sentence, and error by the appellate High Court, the Court discussed the burden of proof, the inferential nature of conspiracy, identification evidence, and sentencing discretion, including Article 296. Given Amidu’s prior firearm-related history and the aggravated circumstances, the Court found the prosecution proved guilt beyond reasonable doubt and that the thirty-year sentence was justified within statutory minima and deterrence aims, dismissing the appeal in its entirety.

JUDGMENT