MERCY KABUKIE TETTEHFIO vs MERCY KABUKIE TETTEHFIO
2016
HIGH COURT
GHANA
CORAM
- HER LADYSHIP JUSTICE LAURENDA OWUSU JUSTICE OF THE HIGH COURT
Areas of Law
- Employment Law
- Evidence Law
AI Generated Summary
An employee of the Ghana Highways Authority (GHA), who began public service at the Public Works Department (PWD) in 1975, sued after GHA compelled her to retire based on a 1954 birth year reflected in some records. She asserted her true birth date is 21 May 1956, supported by a 1984 birth certificate and other documents, and sought correction of records, arrears, and damages. The High Court, per Justice Laurenda Owusu, found the age-declaration condition in GHA’s Senior Staff rules must be interpreted flexibly, especially where initial records lacked documentary substantiation and the Plaintiff had continuous service from PWD. Applying evidentiary rules, the Court treated the birth certificate as prima facie evidence and, unchallenged by GHA, concluded 21 May 1956 was the Plaintiff’s birth date. On termination, the Labour Act’s fairness and procedure requirements, together with natural justice, were decisive; GHA admitted it gave no hearing before forcing compulsory retirement. The Court declared the retirement letter void, ordered record correction, restrained interference until May 2016, and awarded salary arrears with interest, damages, and costs.