MARY YEBOAH @ MARY FORDJOUR v. JAMES KODZO FORDJOUR
2004
COURT OF APPEAL
GHANA
CORAM
- OMARI SASU, J. A. (PRESIDING)
- ANIM, J.A.
- KUSI-APPOUH (MRS), J
Areas of Law
- Civil Procedure
- Evidence Law
- Property and Real Estate Law
2004
COURT OF APPEAL
GHANA
CORAM
AI Generated Summary
Anim, J.A. delivered the Court of Appeal’s decision in a land dispute originating from the Circuit Court, Tema. The Plaintiff sought declaration of title, an injunction, and damages for trespass concerning land at Tema East Akosombo. After various interlocutory steps, the Circuit Court proceeded to trial in the Defendant’s absence and entered judgment, despite ordering hearing notice only days earlier. The Defendant’s motion to set aside was refused, prompting this appeal. The Court of Appeal held that Order 36 rule 9’s ten-day notice requirement (or four-day short notice when ordered) is mandatory, that failure to properly serve hearing notice and to order fresh notices after adjournments violated audi alteram partem, and that the trial court should have called the bailiff amid disputed service. The appeal was allowed and the case remitted for a de novo hearing before a different judge.
JUDGMENT
ANIM, J.A.
In this appeal the Defendant/Appellant (hereinafter referred to as "The Defendant") is seeking for the reversal of the ruling of the Circuit Court, Tema, presided over by His Honour Kwadwo Owusu for refusing to set aside the judgment delivered by him on 15th April 2002 in favour of the Plaintiff/Respondent (hereinafter referred to as "The Plaintiff").
The facts culminating is this appeal may be summarised as follows:— by a Writ issued by the Plaintiff on 5th February 1999, she claimed against the Defendant the following reliefs:—
(a) Declaration of title to the land at Tema East Akosombo measuring 100 x 100 feet with uncompleted building thereon.
(b) An order for perpetual injunction to restrain the Defendant, his agents, assigns, workmen etc, from interfering in the Plaintiff's project until the final determination of this suit.
(c) Damages for trespass.
After pleadings had closed Counsel for the Plaintiff filed Summons for Directions on 17th December 1999 and it was fixed for hearing on 23rd December 1999. There is no indication from the record of proceedings that summons for Directions was taken.
Meanwhile, on 24th February 2000 counsel for the Defendant, filed a Motion on notice for interlocutory injunction, which was fixed for hearing on 8th March 2000.
On the 8th March 2000 the Plaintiff and the Defendant were absent. However, both counsel were present. The Court however adjourned the case to the 16th of March 2000 for the hearing of the application.
On the 16th March 2000, the Court did not sit but the proceedings show that the motion for interim injunction was moved on the 3rd of April 2000. Upon a complaint by the Defendant that there were some people in occupation of the house, the subject-matter of this suit, the Court Ordered the Police at Ashaiman to assist the Defendant to bring all those people in the said house to the Court on 5th April 2000 for interrogation in open court. On the said date one Vida Ofosu and Christian Opare appeared before the Court, whereupon the Court ordered them to vacate the house by 12th April 2000 or in default, the Court would Order that they should be ejected forcibly. The Court then adjourned the matter to 13th April 2000 to ascertain whether or not those in occupation of the house had vacated as ordered by the Court. It is noteworthy that on this very day i.e. 5/4/2000 Counsel for the Defendant filed Notice of Amendment for leave to amend his pleadings by adding a counter-claim. The