Eskwai logo
Verify now as a student, judge or newly called lawyer for access to discounted plans.

MACLEAN II AND ANOTHER v. AKWEI II

1989

COURT OF APPEAL

GHANA

CORAM

  • OSEI-HWERE
  • AMPIAH
  • LAMPTEY JJ.A

Areas of Law

  • Property and Real Estate Law
  • Civil Procedure
  • Evidence Law
  • Equity and Trusts
  • Tort Law

AI Generated Summary

This Ghana Court of Appeal decision concerns a complex land dispute at Odorkor between the Sempe stool (represented by its Mankralo and Acting Sempe Mantse), the Akumajay stool (represented by the Mantse of South Odorkor), and a purchaser, the second defendant, who obtained grants from both stools. The High Court had awarded the plaintiff title over the entire area identified in exhibit C and granted trespass damages and an injunction, while dismissing the defendants’ counterclaims and refusing a special damages claim. On appeal, Ampiah J.A. held that the trial judge improperly granted relief beyond the plaintiff’s writ, misconstrued the 1970 Court of Appeal decision in Crabbe III v. Quaye, and wrongly treated the second defendant’s unregistered instrument as void. Clarifying that non-registration renders instruments invalid but not void, and recognising equitable protection for purchasers, the court found abundant evidence of the second defendant’s possession and grant, and historical judgments establishing the Akumajay stool’s exclusive title to Opete-Kpakpo. The appeal was allowed; declarations of title, possession, injunctions, and damages were granted to the defendants.

JUDGEMENT