KWADWO APPIAH v. KWABENA ANANE
January 22, 2020
SUPREME COURT
CORAM
- YEBOAH, CJ (PRESIDING)
- BAFFOE-BONNIE, JSC
- APPAU, JSC
- PWAMANG, JSC
- AMEGATCHER, JSC
January 22, 2020
SUPREME COURT
CORAM
Try asking the following...
JUDGMENT
AMEGATCHER, JSC:-
We have been called upon as judges of the apex court of the land to have a second look on appeal at this personal injury case. It started from the High Court, Kumasi; was reviewed and ruled upon on appeal by the first intermediate appellate court sitting at Kumasi; and has again on appeal been assigned to us for a final and conclusive resolution. The defendant in the High Court suit who is now the appellant shall hereafter be referred to in this opinion as defendant. The respondent, Kwadwo Appiah, who was plaintiff in the High Court, will hereafter maintain his designation as the plaintiff.
The facts of this appeal have the temptation of arousing the sympathy of any trier of fact. It is not surprising that one of the hard-hitting areas of attack by counsel for the defendant against the learned and respected judges of the Court of Appeal is that they were swayed by sentiments in reaching a decision in this matter. However, those who ply their trade as Barristers and Advocates as well as those of us who act as referees in the competing claims presented to the court know or are deemed to know that a court of law does not make decisions based on emotions, sympathy or sentiments. The time-tested rule for sifting evidence and testing the credibility of the respective cases presented by parties before the court and making a decision one way or the other is evidence. It is against this background that this case was fought in the High Court and Court of Appeal; and it is by the same yardstick that the case, now on appeal before the apex court will be considered.
The events, giving rise to this case, started on 28th April, 2009. The plaintiff, a timber merchant of 39 years at the time of the incident acting through his friend and business partner called Sammy hired the defendant’s truck numbered AS 5471-X to cart his timber logs from Diaso near Dunkwa to Mim in the then Brong Ahafo Region. On reaching a place called Kwabena Kumah, the vehicle was involved in an accident. The plaintiff, Sammy and the driver of the vehicle sustained serious injuries and were sent to Goaso Government Hospital. Because of the seriousness of the injuries suffered, the plaintiff was later transferred to the Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital in Kumasi for further treatment where he received intensive care from 30th April, 2009 to 4th September, 2009 before being discharged to continue his treatment as an outpatient.
The plaintiff on 20th June, 2012, after seeki
AI Generated Summary
The Supreme Court of Ghana, per Amegatcher JSC with the Chief Justice Anin Yeboah and Justices Baffoe-Bonnie, Appau, and Pwamang concurring, resolved a personal injury appeal involving timber merchant Kwadwo Appiah and the truck owner-defendant. Appiah was catastrophically injured when the defendants truck (AS 5471-X), hired through Appiahs associate Sammy, crashed at Kwabena Kumah. The defendant conceded the truck lacked insurance and a valid road use certificate and that the driver was unlicensed. The High Court found vicarious liability but awarded only GH20,000; the Court of Appeal increased damages to GH150,000 (GH140,000 non-pecuniary; GH10,000 pecuniary). On further appeal by the defendant, the Supreme Court affirmed negligence and vicarious liability, accepted the unchallenged medical report (Exhibit A) establishing 100% loss of genital function, and reassessed damages using established heads and comparative guidance, accounting for inflation and lifelong incapacitation. Exercising Order 16 Rule 7 of C.I. 47, the Court amended the pleaded claim and increased total damages to GH22,600, dismissing the defendants appeal in its entirety.