Eskwai logo
Verify now as a student, judge or newly called lawyer for access to discounted plans.

JAMILA YAKUBU v. ABDUL AZIZ ISHAK

March 31, 2022

COURT OF APPEAL

GHANA

CORAM

  • A. M. DOMAKYAAREH (MRS), J. A. PRESIDING
  • A. B. POKU-ACHEAMPONG, J. A.
  • S. K. A. ASIEDU, J. A.

Areas of Law

  • Probate and Succession
  • Civil Procedure
  • Evidence Law
  • Constitutional Law
  • Criminal Law and Procedure

AI Generated Summary

The Court of Appeal (Ghana), per Poku‑Acheampong, J.A., dismissed Abdul Aziz Ishak’s appeal from the Kumasi High Court’s conviction for intermeddling under Order 66 rule 3 of C.I. 47. The widow, Jamila Yakubu, had applied for Letters of Administration over the estate of her late husband, Mahmoud Issaka, while Ishak, the deceased’s younger brother and customary successor, caveated and was ordered to deposit GH¢300,000 into court. Yakubu later sought an intermeddling order, alleging Ishak possessed estate assets and monies including an unregistered Toyota Highlander and GH¢1,379,400 collected from debtors. The Court of Appeal held that intermeddling is a quasi‑criminal offence validly commenced by application, analogizing to contempt, and that crimes directly in issue require proof beyond reasonable doubt. Relying on affidavit materials, Ishak’s own motion to vary the deposit order, and his failure to deny possession of inventory items, the court found the offence proved beyond reasonable doubt. It rejected claims of misdirection, weight of evidence, and breach of audi alteram partem, noting no formal cross‑examination request. The appeal was dismissed in its entirety, with DOMAKYAAREH, J.A. (Presiding) and ASIEDU, J.A. concurring.

JUDGMENT