Eskwai logo
Verify now as a student, judge or newly called lawyer for access to discounted plans.

JAMES AMARH AMARTEY v. ELECTORAL COMMISSION OF GHANA & HON. ATTORNEY-GENERAL

2012

SUPREME COURT

GHANA

CORAM

  • ATUGUBA, AG .C.J (PRESIDING)
  • DR. DATE-BAH, J.S.C
  • ANSAH, J.S.C.
  • OWUSU (MS.),J.S.C
  • ANIN-YEBOAH, J.S.C.
  • GBADEGBE, J.S.C.
  • AKOTO-BAMFO (MRS.) J.S.C

Areas of Law

  • Constitutional Law
  • Administrative Law

AI Generated Summary

A Ghanaian citizen brought an original constitutional action challenging the Minister of Local Government’s purported creation of electoral areas via LI 1983, arguing it contravened Article 45(b), which vests the Electoral Commission with authority to demarcate electoral boundaries. He also sought to invalidate CI 78, the Representation of the People (Parliamentary Constituencies) Instrument 2012, for allegedly incorporating those minister-created areas. The Electoral Commission conceded the Minister lacked authority and asked the Court to sever only the unconstitutional portions of LI 1983. The Attorney-General argued electoral areas differ from electoral boundaries and defended LI 1983 under Act 462. Writing for a unanimous Court, Owusu JSC held that Article 45(b) makes the Electoral Commission’s demarcation exclusive; Act 462 does not empower the Minister to create electoral areas. Applying severability, the Court voided LI 1983 only to the extent it purported to create electoral areas, preserving valid parts relating to District Assemblies. The Court rejected the challenge to CI 78, noting its constitutionality had already been affirmed.

JUDGMENT