IN RE AGYEMANG (DECD.); ADDAE v. FOSUAH
May 30, 1968
HIGH COURT
GHANA
CORAM
- ANNAN J
Areas of Law
- Probate and Succession
- Civil Procedure
- Evidence Law
May 30, 1968
HIGH COURT
GHANA
CORAM
Try asking the following...
JUDGMENT OF ANNAN J.
The plaintiff-applicant is the eldest child of Ama Agyemang, the deceased and the granddaughter of the defendant-caveatrix Yaa Fosuah. Ama Agyemang was the daughter of the defendant. Sometime after the death of Ama Agyemang, her daughter, the plaintiff, applied to this court for letters of administration to administer the estate of her mother who died intestate. She filed an affidavit in support of her motion in which she said that she was the customary successor of the deceased and that she was appointed by the unanimous consent of the family. She did not file any affidavit by the head of family to support her statement that she was the person appointed by the family as customary successor. After notices had been filed, the defendant entered a caveat and in her affidavit of interest she stated that after the death of Ama Agyemang, the principal members of her family met and appointed her as the lawful successor to the estate of the deceased. Subsequently an order was made and the applicant filed a statement of claim (without issuing a writ) in terms of the order of the court, and the defendant filed a defence.
The single issue which was set down for trial was:
"Whether or not the applicant-plaintiff is better entitled to the letters of administration than the caveatrix the defendant."
The evidence adduced in support of the plaintiff's claim is that of her father and her nineteen-year-old brother. The plaintiff is a young [p.521] woman who gave her age as twenty years (her father put her age at 22 years). She has two children and is the eldest of the eight children of her mother. She said she was appointed customary successor to her mother by the family in the presence of and with the concurrence of the defendant and their head of family Opanin Kwasi Mensah at a family meeting at Kunsu Wiawso, the hometown of the deceased. According to the plaintiff her appointment was by the whole family at Kunso Wiawso and she gave the name of the principal members who were present, apart from the defendant and the head of family, as her uncle Kojo, Adu Atwanema, Kwame Nuamah and her grand-mother, Abena Tiah, sister of the defendant. This appointment took place on the fortieth day and the family, including the defendant, told her to cook in her mother's kitchen and look after her brothers and sisters, and take good care of her mother's personal effects.
According to the plaintiff some time after her appointment she was told by her father that
AI Generated Summary
Following the intestate death of cloth seller Ama Agyemang, her eldest child applied for letters of administration, asserting she had been appointed customary successor by unanimous family consent. Her grandmother, Yaa Fosuah, entered a caveat claiming principal family members had appointed her successor on the eighth day after death. The plaintiff relied on her father, Acheampong, and brother, while the defendant produced head of the immediate family, Opanin Kwasi Mensah, and elder Abena Tiah, who confirmed her appointment. The court found the plaintiff’s evidence inconsistent and influenced by her father, who withheld the deceased’s bank book, and rejected allegations of family neglect of the eight children. Applying Ashanti matrilineal succession principles (Krabah v. Krakue; Asamoah v. Ofori) and the rule that grants follow the largest interest and benefit the estate (In re Essuman), the court determined the defendant was duly appointed successor. To safeguard the estate and beneficiaries, it exercised discretion to grant letters jointly to the granddaughter and grandmother, with costs borne by the estate.