JUDGMENT OF AMMAH J.
On 20 November 1987 the plaintiff by his solicitor issued a writ of summons against the defendants. He is claiming from them jointly and severally (1) the return of personal effects which he consigned with the second defendants and received by the first defendants or alternatively the value of the items thereof assessed at the time of judgment; and (2) ¢500,000 damages for wrongful detention of the plaintiff's items.
The statement of claim is as follows:
"(1) The plaintiff is a tutor and stayed in Nigeria between 1980-1986 and in July and August 1983 he consigned some [p.82] personal effects from Ibadan, Nigeria to Ghana through the first defendant herein.
(2) The defendants are airlines which operate on the Accra-Lagos route and are carriers of passengers and cargo.
(3) The plaintiff says somewhere in July and August of 1983 he consigned two separate items of personal effects through the first defendant and was received by the second defendant for delivery to him in Ghana.
(4) The plaintiff says when he reported at the cargo section of the second defendant for collection of his items, a sound system among the items in the first and all the items in the second consignment could not be delivered to him.
(5) The plaintiff says he promptly reported this to an official of the cargo section of the second defendant who assured him that there was short landing of his goods.
(6) The plaintiff says in spite of repeated and persistent demands on both the first and second defendants for delivery of the said items the said items have not been delivered to him.
(7) The plaintiff says detailed list of description of the personal effects that were consigned but were not delivered are attached herewith and marked A."
The statement of defence filed on behalf of the first defendants is as follows:
“(1) Save that sometime in 1983 the plaintiff consigned some luggage from Ibadan in Nigeria to Ghana through the first defendants, the first defendants make no admission of the averments contained in paragraph (1) of the statement of claim.
(2) The first defendants admit paragraphs (2) and (3) of the statement of claim.
(3) The first defendants say in further answer to paragraph (3) of the statement of claim that neither the value nor contents of the plaintiff's said luggage were disclosed to the first defendants.
(4) The first defendants make no admission of paragraph (4) of the statement of claim and put the plaintiff to strict proof of the s