Eskwai logo
Verify now as a student, judge or newly called lawyer for access to discounted plans.

FRANCIS AFEDO, ZAKARIA MUSAH AND IKENNA OJINNAK v. REPUBLIC

2022

HIGH COURT

GHANA

CORAM

  • HER LADYSHIP JUSTICE DOREEN G. BOAKYE-AGYEI (MRS.) JUSTICE OF THE HIGH COURT

Areas of Law

  • Criminal Law and Procedure
  • Evidence Law

AI Generated Summary

The High Court, per Her Ladyship Justice Doreen G. Boakye‑Agyei, considered an appeal by Ikenna Ojinnak, a Mepe‑based mobile phone repairer, convicted by the Sogakope Circuit Court of dishonestly receiving after he pleaded “guilty with explanation.” The complainant, teacher Charles Dorbordoe, left a Tecno Spark 7 phone charging; witnesses implicated Francis Afedo (A1), and police recovered the phone from Zakaria Musah (A2). A2 stated that Ojinnak (A3) had unlocked the phone’s password. On appeal, counsel argued the explanation negated guilt and that the sentence was harsh. The High Court reaffirmed the practice on guilty‑with‑explanation, found the recorded explanation and surrounding circumstances consistent with guilty knowledge or at least suspicion warranting inquiry, and refused to alter the record per alleged typos. Upholding the conviction, the court nevertheless held the 24‑month term harsh given first‑offender status and recovery of the phone, substituting a three‑month sentence.

JUDGMENT