Eskwai logo
Verify now as a student, judge or newly called lawyer for access to discounted plans.

FIADZOE v. KUADZI

1978

COURT OF APPEAL

GHANA

CORAM

  • ANNAN JJ.A.
  • KINGSLEY-NYINAH
  • SOWAH

Areas of Law

  • Contract Law
  • Commercial Law
  • Tort Law

AI Generated Summary

This Ghana Court of Appeal decision, authored by Annan J.A. with Sowah J.A. and Kingsley-Nyinah J.A. concurring, concerns a hire-purchase of a Toyota bus (GM 162) under a written agreement (exhibit B) dated 30 June 1971. The hirer paid N¢672 initially and disputed the first instalment; the trial judge found only N¢170 was paid and that the hirer breached clause 4. The vehicle owner seized the bus around 23 August 1971. The Court held that exhibit B contained no contractual right to seize; clause 6 permitted only legal action to recover the balance. Under the Sale of Goods Act, 1962 (Act 137), Part VIII creates no seizure right, and section 44’s unpaid seller remedy is subject to contrary intention under section 76. Common law bailment did not permit repossession for a single missed instalment absent an express term. The seizure was wrongful and the appeal was dismissed.

JUDGMENT