EDMUND MILLS VS LANDS COMMISSION
2022
HIGH COURT
GHANA
CORAM
- HER LADYSHIP JUSTICE ANANDA J. AIKINS (MRS)
Areas of Law
- Contract Law
- Property and Real Estate Law
- Evidence Law
- Equity and Trusts
- Civil Procedure
2022
HIGH COURT
GHANA
CORAM
AI Generated Summary
This High Court judgment by Her Ladyship Justice Ananda J. Aikins (Mrs) concerns an applicant’s attempt to compel the Lands Commission to engross a lease and deliver vacant possession of Plot No. 75 in the Cantonments Residential Area under the Government Residential Areas Redevelopment Scheme. After an initial GH28,000 cheque issued in January 2009 expired because the Commission did not present it, the Commission confirmed the allocation by letter dated 4 July 2011 requiring payment within one month. The court found the applicant’s CalBank payment orders were issued on 21 June 2012, nearly a year late, and later Ecobank orders were reissued in April 2019 without evidence the offer remained valid. Invoking the Evidence Act (NRCD 323) and the equitable maxim that one who seeks equity must do equity, the court held the applicant failed to act timeously and provided no credible proof of financial losses. The claims for specific performance, damages, and costs were dismissed.
INTRODUCTION
(1) The plaintiff sued the defendant for the following reliefs: (a) An order of specific performance for the defendant to engross a lease in respect of plot no. 75 Cantonments Residential Area in favour of the plaintiff and give vacant possession of the said property to him.
b) Damages for breach of contract(a) Costs inclusive of legal fees(b) Any further relief that this honourable court may deem fit.
This order was only complied with by the plaintiff.
The defendant failed to file its witness statement and it also failed to appear in court for the trial despite the service of several hearing notices on it.
CASE OF PLAINTIFF
(4) It was the case of the plaintiff that sometime in the year 2007 he applied to the defendant to acquire a plot of land under phase 2 of the Redevelopment of Government Residential Areas (Cantonments and North Ridge) Scheme.
He said he was allocated plot number 75 in Cantonments Residential Area by the defendant and thereafter he issued a cheque in favour of the defendant for an amount of GHC528, 000 as payment for the said plot number 75.
Thereafter the defendant in the year 2011 gave him another letter dated the 4th of July 2011, confirming the allocation of the same plot no. 75 to him and that on the 4th of August 2011 he paid the amount of GH¢528, 000. 00 to the defendant via banker’s drafts issued by CalBank.
Again the defendant failed to present those bankers drafts in due time for clearing with the result that the drafts too expired.
The plaintiff said he acted upon the said advice and had the banker’s drafts re-issued but the defendant still reneged on its side of the bargain and failed to issue a l