Eskwai logo
Verify now as a student, judge or newly called lawyer for access to discounted plans.

EBUSUAPAYNIN PROPHET JOSEPH KINGSLEY BOATENG for himself and on behalf of the Boafo Kobina Pitsir, Kwaata Anona Family of Upper Inchaban-Apimenmin v. 1. KWAMINA SIISI and ANOR

December 5, 2017

COURT OF APPEAL

GHANA

CORAM

  • IRENE CHARITY LARBI MRS. J.A (PRESIDING)
  • L. L. MENSAH (J.A)
  • ANGELINA M. DOMAKYAAREH MRS.( J.A)

Areas of Law

  • Property and Real Estate Law
  • Civil Procedure
  • Evidence Law

AI Generated Summary

The Ghana Court of Appeal, per Irene Charity Larbi J.A., reversed the Sekondi High Court’s declaration awarding Abirika Anaafo land to the strand led by Prophet Joseph K. Boateng. Boateng claimed exclusive ancestral rights through Boafo Kobina and argued that defendants Kwamina Siisi and Kojo Yankson were descendants of househelps brought from Techiman, hence strangers to the lineage. Relying on cross-examination, prior suits, and Supreme Court precedent (Civil Appeal No. J4/27/2011), the Court of Appeal found the defendants to be acknowledged members of the Pitsir Kwaata Anona family, and confirmed that the plaintiff’s group had seceded. The court criticized Exhibit “A” (National Archives history) for inaccuracies, emphasized the appellate re-hearing standard and the family land allegiance doctrine from Amoabimaa v Okyir, and concluded that secession precluded Boateng from claiming headship and ownership over the original family estate. The appeal was allowed, the High Court judgment set aside, and the defendants’ counterclaims for title and injunction were granted.

JUDGMENT