Eskwai logo
Verify now as a student, judge or newly called lawyer for access to discounted plans.

DO II EMMANUEL QUAYE VS GHANA NATIONAL FIRE SERVICE COUNCIL & ANOR

2016

HIGH COURT

GHANA

CORAM

  • HER LADYSHIP GIFTY AGYEI ADDO, J. A

Areas of Law

  • Constitutional Law
  • Administrative Law
  • Civil Procedure

AI Generated Summary

This case involves a motion filed by an Applicant against the Ghana National Fire Service (GNFS) and the Attorney General, seeking to enforce his human rights after his promotion was withdrawn. The key issue was whether the Attorney General should be a party to the suit. The court examined the legal status of the GNFS and the role of the Attorney General in representing state institutions. The court determined that the GNFS, as established by the Ghana National Fire Service Act, 1997 (Act 537), is a state institution without autonomous status to sue or be sued independently. Consequently, any alleged violations by the GNFS are imputable to the state, making the state vicariously liable. The court interpreted Article 88(5) of the Constitution of Ghana, which states that the Attorney General is responsible for all civil cases on behalf of the state. This provision was distinguished from Order 67 Rule 3 of C.I. 47, which only requires serving notice on the Attorney General but does not make them a party to the suit. Based on these interpretations, the court concluded that the Attorney General automatically becomes a party to suits against state agencies without autonomous status. Therefore, the application to non-suit the Attorney General was dismissed as it lacked legal basis. This ruling clarifies the role of the Attorney General in representing state institutions in civil proceedings and reinforces the principle of state liability for actions of its agencies that lack autonomous legal status.

RULING