Eskwai logo
Verify now as a student, judge or newly called lawyer for access to discounted plans.

DEI XI v. DARKE XII

July 8, 1991

SUPREME COURT

GHANA

CORAM

  • ADADE
  • AMUA-SEKYI
  • OSEI-HWERE
  • EDWARD WIREDU JJ.S.C.
  • OFORI-BOATENG J.A

Areas of Law

  • Civil Procedure

AI Generated Summary

This Supreme Court application concerned whether an appeal, deemed struck out under rule 13(2) of the Supreme Court Rules, 1970 (C.I. 13) for failure to file the statement of case within three weeks of notice, could be relisted and heard on the merits. After the High Court, Accra ruled against the defendants and the Court of Appeal affirmed, the defendants obtained leave to appeal. They were notified on 15 January 1991 that the record was ready, but missed the 5 February 1991 deadline. The Registrar informed the parties on 1 March 1991 that the appeal was deemed struck out. Represented by Mr. Kwame Tetteh, the applicants filed their statement on 4 March and moved on 13 March to relist, relying on rule 66(1). Mr. da Rocha for the respondents argued rule 66 applies only to “actions” in the Court’s original jurisdiction. Multiple opinions were delivered: Adade J.S.C. viewed rule 66 broadly; Amua-Sekyi J.S.C. considered enlargement possible for good cause; Osei-Hwere J.S.C. and Edward Wiredu J.S.C. held no jurisdiction under rule 66; Ofori-Boateng J.A. read rule 66 to include appeals but found the interests of justice unsatisfied. The Court unanimously dismissed the application.

JUDGMENT