Eskwai logo
Verify now as a student, judge or newly called lawyer for access to discounted plans.

C/INSPR CRISTOPHER OKPATTAH & 39 ORS v. THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE & 20RS

2025

HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE

CORAM

  • HIS LORDSHIP JUSTICE FREDERICK TETTEH

Areas of Law

  • Administrative Law
  • Employment Law
  • Evidence Law

AI Generated Summary

Chief Inspectors of the Ghana Police Service, all degree holders, sued seeking one-step promotions with three incremental credits to the rank of Assistant Superintendent of Police and direct entry into the Police Academy, invoking a 2021 directive and subsequent special amnesty signals. They tendered police wireless messages and petitions to support their claim that similarly situated junior officers received administrative promotions. The Court examined the Police Service Regulations (C.I. 76) and the Evidence Act’s preponderance standard, stressing that academic qualifications do not automatically confer promotion and that the party who asserts must prove. Finding no documentary proof that Plaintiffs submitted certificates or that C.I. 76 was set aside, and deeming the ‘amnesty’ a discretionary administrative policy, the Court held it lacked authority to compel promotions or direct entry. It dismissed the claims, urged adherence to legal promotion processes, and declined to award costs.