Eskwai logo
Verify now as a student, judge or newly called lawyer for access to discounted plans.

BOATENG ALIAS BEYEDEN v. ADJEI AND ANOTHER

1963

SUPREME COURT

GHANA

CORAM

  • SARKODEE-ADOO
  • MILLS-ODOI
  • AKUFO-ADDO JJ.S.C

Areas of Law

  • Property and Real Estate Law
  • Evidence Law
  • Equity and Trusts
  • Probate and Succession

AI Generated Summary

In a dispute over the status of properties acquired by Kwasi Baah, a long-serving Nsenifuorhene of Koforidua, the Supreme Court of Ghana upheld the High Court’s decision granting title and possession to Baah’s immediate family, represented by his brother, Kwasi Adei, and Effiduasi branch head, Yaw Kobi. Baah, from the Effiduasi Agona family branch of the Nsenifuor stool family, kept his private assets distinct from stool assets handed over at accession. After Baah’s death, a successor was destooled and the defendant enstooled, who claimed the properties had become stool properties by custom and by Baah’s alleged declaration. Rejecting the Local Court’s estoppel finding, the Supreme Court held that Antu v. Buedu’s “earmarking” dictum is evidentiary rather than substantive; self-acquired property does not merge into stool property by office or non-earmarking; no gift was proved; and acquiescence was not made out under Willmot v. Barber. The appeal was dismissed with costs.

JUDGMENT