Eskwai logo
Verify now as a student, judge or newly called lawyer for access to discounted plans.

ARTHUR v. AYENSU.

1957

DIVISIONAL COURT (COLONIAL)

GHANA

CORAM

  • Adumua-Bossman J

Areas of Law

  • Probate and Succession
  • Property and Real Estate Law
  • Civil Procedure

AI Generated Summary

Adumua-Bossman J. reviewed the decisions of the Municipal Court of Cape Coast and the Magistrate's Court constituted by the Government Agent, which dismissed a claim concerning the self-acquired house of the late John Ayensu of Cape Coast. The plaintiff, acting as head of the Anona family, sought to maintain the action. The lower courts reasoned that Mrs. Faustina Daniels, the deceased’s niece and administratrix, was the proper party by virtue of letters of administration; Adumua-Bossman J. held that rationale unsound because letters of administration vest only personal, not real, estate. He clarified that if the deceased was married under the Marriage Ordinance, real estate devolves upon the widow, children, and family as tenants-in-common; otherwise, under native customary law, it devolves upon the immediate uterine family tracing through females from the deceased’s mother. Applying these principles, the court concluded the plaintiff lacked standing. It confirmed the dismissals and dismissed the appeal with costs.