Eskwai logo
Verify now as a student, judge or newly called lawyer for access to discounted plans.

ARCHIBOLD v. C.F.A.O.

January 25, 1966

HIGH COURT

GHANA

CORAM

  • HAYFRON-BENJAMIN J

Areas of Law

  • Tort Law
  • Intellectual Property Law
  • Civil Procedure

AI Generated Summary

This judgment by Hayfron-Benjamin J. addresses preliminary legal issues in a conversion suit brought by a composer against Senaphone record label owners for recording and selling twelve identified songs without consent, alleging large-scale sales and seeking £G25,000 in damages. The defendants denied ownership and any copyright, disputed sales of the listed songs after 1959, and relied on a prior copyright infringement action (Suit No. 618/1962) that ended with the Supreme Court’s dismissal in C.F.A.O. v. Archibold, as well as a statute-of-limitations defence under the Copyright Act, 1911. The court reframed the matter as a tort claim, emphasizing that novel tort actions may be recognized when justice requires, and that Ghanaian courts may draw on global jurisprudence. Citing American cases and policy reasons to protect even unwritten compositions, the court held the action maintainable, overruled objections, and directed the case to proceed to hearing.

Judgement