Eskwai logo
Verify now as a student, judge or newly called lawyer for access to discounted plans.

AMA BOATEMAA v. 1. YAW YAMOAH ( H/NO. PT. 3 BLOCH ‘G’ SANTASI/KUMASI ) and ORS

2018

COURT OF APPEAL

GHANA

CORAM

  • IRENE C. LARBI (MRS), J.A. (PRESIDING)
  • LAWRENCE L. MENSAH, J.A.
  • A. M. DOMAKYAAREH (MRS), J.A.

Areas of Law

  • Probate and Succession
  • Property and Real Estate Law
  • Evidence Law
  • Civil Procedure

AI Generated Summary

This Court of Appeal decision arises from family litigation over the estate of Samuel Kwabena Obeng, who died intestate in 2006. His widow, a co-administrator, sued the customary successor, another surviving spouse and her daughter, and the deceased’s brother, contesting their exclusion of the Bogoso filling station from the estate inventory. The High Court declared the filling station to be the deceased’s self-acquired property, granted the defendants’ counterclaims, and awarded costs against the widow. On appeal, the defendants argued the filling station was family property and that the 1994 lease was fraudulent; the widow cross-appealed that the stores were not part of the estate and that costs were unjustified. The Court of Appeal, relying on documentary evidence (lease, sublease to ELF, site plan, registration) and consistent testimony, dismissed both the appeal and most of the cross-appeal. It held the filling station and associated stores formed part of the estate, rejected the fraud allegation for lack of proof beyond reasonable doubt, found no procedural error in admitting late documents, and set aside the GH⊄3,000 cost award.

JUDGMENT