Eskwai logo
Verify now as a student, judge or newly called lawyer for access to discounted plans.

ALFA ENTERPRISES LTD. v. PAN AFRICAN TRADING CO. AND ANOTHER

1978

COURT OF APPEAL

CORAM

  • JIAGGE
  • ANNAN
  • FRANCOIS JJ.A

Areas of Law

  • Maritime Law
  • Commercial Law
  • Contract Law
  • Civil Procedure

AI Generated Summary

This appeal arose from a dispute over a shipment of galvanised iron sheets consigned to Banque Libane Francaise and later endorsed to the plaintiffs. Nichenen Co., Ltd. shipped the goods to Tema aboard the Straat Freedom, owned by the first defendant carrier. Despite the endorsed bill of lading being held by the plaintiffs, the carrier had released the cargo to Alfa Enterprises Ltd., named only as the notifying party, upon a a25,000 indemnity signed by a third defendant. The High Court entered judgment against the carrier for failure to deliver to the plaintiffs or assigns, and granted the carrier judgment on the co-defendants indemnity. On appeal, Alfa Enterprises Ltd. and its director argued the bill of lading did not confer ownership and that summary procedure was inappropriate. Applying established authorities on bills of lading and distinguishing Finlay v. Liverpool, the Court of Appeal held that indorsement and delivery of the bill served as delivery of the goods, a notifying party had no title, carriers deliver at their peril without production of the bill, and summary procedure was proper. The appeal was dismissed.

Judgement