ADWOA NYARKOWAH v. YAW OFOSU & 3ORS
2022
DISTRICT COURT
GHANA
CORAM
- HER WORSHIP EUNICE A. APALIWEN MRS
Areas of Law
- Property and Real Estate Law
- Evidence Law
- Alternative dispute resolution
- Civil Procedure
2022
DISTRICT COURT
GHANA
CORAM
AI Generated Summary
HER WORSHIP Eunice A. Apaliwen (Magistrate) decided a land dispute over a parcel adjoining House No. AP30 at Apagya, Breman Asikuma. The plaintiff, acting for herself and her brother, asserted that their late father, retired policeman Kofi Donkor, personally acquired the land, built AP30, and gifted the house and adjoining land. The defendants—including the 4th defendant, Isaac Ofosu Marfo, successor to Kojo Kontoh, and the 2nd and 3rd defendant tenants—contended that the land was Abradze family property and that leases they held were valid. The court found the identity of the land undisputed and credited corroborative evidence showing AP30 and the adjoining land were personally acquired by Kofi Donkor. Although the attempted customary gift was incomplete for lack of accepted aseda, the court held that his children are entitled to take over his property, subject to rooms previously granted under church mediation and affirmed by CHRAJ. Defendants failed to prove family ownership and slept on their rights; leases were void, possession and injunction ordered, and costs awarded.
The plaintiff suing on her own behalf and that of her brother caused a writ of summons
to be issued on their behalf for the following reliefs;
1. A declaration of title and ownership of a piece of land adjourning house number
AP30 located at Apagya, Breman Asikuma bounded by the main road, house
number AP 30, Desbeck Catering Services and Mr. Akwesi’s plot in favour of the
plaintiff and her brother.
2. Order for recovery of possession of the disputed land.
3. Perpetual injunction restraining the defendants, their assigns, privies, agents,
relatives, and all those claiming authority through them from accessing or using
the land without the express consent and approval of the plaintiff and her brother.
The Defendants pleaded not liable to all the reliefs. The 1st and 4th defendants also
counterclaim for the following;
1. Declaration of title and ownership of the disputed land in favour of the 4th
Defendant, Isaac Ofosu Marfo.
2. An order for perpetual injunction against the plaintiffs and all who may deal with
the land on their behalf
3. A declaration that the rent or lease agreement between the 1st defendant and the
2nd and 3rd defendants is valid for all purposes.
The case of the plaintiff is that 1st defendant is the successor to her father, Kofi Donkor.
That the 2nd and 3rd Defendants are tenants on the land in dispute. The boundaries of the
land stated1. His father bought the land on which House number AP30 is situated as well
as the adjoining land. Her father Kofi Donkor bought the land from Nana Amoakwa
Boadu VI, hence the house and adjoining land are the personal properties of her father.
That an uncle of her father, Kofi Gyasi also gave a parcel of land at Beposo in
Dawurapong to him, and he cultivated cocoa. In 1973, her father gave the cocoa farm and
the house with the disputed land to her, and her brother in a deed of gift executed on the
10th of October 1973. She insists that the land in dispute is not a family land2. In 1976, her
father was sued for a debt he was owing which the house he had already given to them
as a gift was attached for the payment of the debt3. A nephew of her father, Kojo Kontoh
who claimed to have paid for the debt (to prevent house number AP 30 from being
auctioned) said Kofi Donkor promised to give him some rooms in the house as
compensation4. Whiles her father was alive, Kojo Kontoh summoned him before the
elders of both the Presbyterian Church and Pentecost where her father agreed