Eskwai logo
Verify now as a student, judge or newly called lawyer for access to discounted plans.

ADU BOAHENE v. THE REPUBLIC

1971

COURT OF APPEAL

GHANA

CORAM

  • AZU CRABBE J.S.C.
  • LASSEY
  • JIAGGE JJ.A

Areas of Law

  • Criminal Law and Procedure
  • Evidence Law

AI Generated Summary

Justice Azu Crabbe delivered the Supreme Court’s judgment upholding the jury convictions of an accused for conspiracy and robbery arising from a violent attack on Agip (Ghana) Ltd. petrol dealer William Kyei Appiah near Osu, Accra. The complainant, who had known the appellant for years and had seen him at the station shortly before the incident, identified him during the assault and again at the appellant’s house in the presence of a police officer. Prosecution witness Clement Osae Asiedu saw the appellant flee and later helped locate him. On appeal, counsel Mr. Annan contended insufficient identification because no parade was held and no personal characteristics were proved. The Court held that where the witness knows the accused and leads police to him, an identification parade is unnecessary; the adequacy and weight of identification are for the jury. Finding no misdirection and ample evidence, the Court dismissed the conviction appeal and, citing deterrence principles and the prevalence of robbery, also affirmed the fifteen-year sentence.

JUDGMENT