Eskwai logo
Verify now as a student, judge or newly called lawyer for access to discounted plans.

ADJEIODA v. C.F.A.O.

1971

HIGH COURT

GHANA

CORAM

  • ABBAN J

Areas of Law

  • Civil Procedure
  • Evidence Law

AI Generated Summary

Justice Abban considered an application by A. K. Adjeioda under Order 42, rule 22 of the Supreme (High) Court Civil Procedure Rules, 1954, seeking leave to issue execution on a 1953 High Court judgment in suit No. 271/1952, Messrs. C.F.A.O. v. A. K. Adjeioda. In that suit, C.F.A.O. alleged stock shortages against Adjeioda, a storekeeper at Kadjebi, Buem, but a referee’s report led Smith Ag.J. to dismiss the respondents’ claim and enter judgment for Adjeioda’s counterclaim for £956 19s. 3d. With over seventeen years elapsed, the respondents opposed leave, suggesting payment and asserting a twelve-year bar under the Real Property Limitation Act, 1874. The court held the respondents bore and failed to prove payment, determined the 1874 Act was not of general application in Ghana, applied the 1833 Act’s twenty-year period, found the judgment within time, and, exercising discretion under Order 42, granted leave. The court refused interest in light of Northern Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Anang, and awarded costs of N¢35.00.

JUDGMENT