Eskwai logo
Verify now as a student, judge or newly called lawyer for access to discounted plans.

Thurloe Lodge Ltd v Amberwood Drive Ltd & Anor

April 29, 2021

CHANCERY DIVISION

United Kingdom

CORAM

  • Deputy Master Arkush

Areas of Law

  • Civil Procedure
  • Property and Real Estate Law

AI Generated Summary

Deputy Master Arkush decided two summary judgment applications brought by Amberwood Drive Limited and Prime London Holdings 11 Limited against Thurloe Lodge Limited in a dispute over easement rights to stop, park, load, unload, carry out works, and maintain/replace services on a private gated roadway opposite the Victoria and Albert Museum. The roadway serves as the sole vehicular access to Thurloe Lodge and Amberwood House. After years of coordinated redevelopment, relations soured and the Defendants blocked access, prompting an interim injunction from Mr David Holland QC. The Defendants sought to foreclose the Claimant’s claims under section 62 of the Law of Property Act 1925 and prescription. Applying the Easyair summary judgment principles, the court rejected preliminary estoppel arguments and held that contested factual issues (including historical user, continuity, alleged interruption by a burger van, and contextual interpretation of a ‘no obstruction’ covenant) require trial. The applications were dismissed, preserving the status quo until a scheduled trial.